Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38580359›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Understanding the language barriers to translating informed consent documents for maternal health trials in Zambia: a qualitative study.

Alice Beardmore-Gray, Musonda Simwinga, Bellington Vwalika, Sebastian Chinkoyo, Lucy Chappell, Jane Sandall, Andrew Shennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice Beardmore-GrayDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK alice.1.beardmore-gray@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9923-4912
Musonda SimwingaZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bellington VwalikaUniversity Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sebastian ChinkoyoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ndola Teaching Hospital, Ndola, Zambia.
Lucy ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProviding comprehensible information is essential to the process of valid informed consent. Recruitment materials designed by sponsoring institutions in English-speaking, high-income countries are commonly translated for use in global health studies in other countries; however, key concepts are often missed, misunderstood or 'lost in translation'. The aim of this study was to explore the language barriers to informed consent, focusing on the challenges of translating recruitment materials for maternal health studies into Zambian languages.

designWe used a qualitative approach, which incorporated a multistakeholder workshop (11 participants), in-depth interviews with researchers and translators (8 participants) and two community-based focus groups with volunteers from community advisory boards (20 participants). Content analysis was used to identify terms commonly occurring in recruitment materials prior to the workshop. The framework analysis approach was used to analyse interview data, and a simple inductive thematic analysis approach was used to analyse focus group data.

settingThe study was based in Lusaka, Zambia.

resultsThe workshop highlighted difficulties in translating research terms and pregnancy-specific terms, as well as widespread concern that current templates are too long, use overly formal language and are designed with little input from local teams. Framework analysis of in-depth interviews identified barriers to participant understanding relating to design and development of recruitment materials, language, local context and communication styles. Focus group participants confirmed these findings and suggested potential solutions to ensure the language and content of recruitment materials can be better understood.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that the way in which recruitment materials are currently designed, translated and disseminated may not enable potential trial participants to fully understand the information provided. Instead of using overly complex institutional templates, recruitment materials should be created through an iterative and interactive process that provides truly comprehensible information in a format appropriate for its intended participants.

Indexed as

Consent FormsMaternal HealthCommunication BarriersFemaleHumansInformed ConsentPregnancyTranslatingZambiaMEDICAL ETHICSOBSTETRICSQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID38580359
PMCPMC11002372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.