Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38579780›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2024

The evolution of poller screws.

Andrew Kailin Zhou, Eric Jou, Victor Lu, James Zhang, Shirom Chabra, Matija Krkovic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew Kailin ZhouDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6656-8123
Eric JouKellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Victor LuDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
James ZhangDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Shirom ChabraDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Matija KrkovicDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBBasildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWest Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to other techniques, poller screws with intramedullary nailing are technically simple, practical, and reproducible for the fixation of metaphyseal fractures. In addition, poller screws do not require special instruments or hardware and are minimally invasive. This review takes a historical perspective to evaluate poller screws holistically. A non-systematic search on PubMed was performed using 'Poller screw' or 'Blocking screw' to find early use of poller blocking screws. Relevant references from these primary studies were then followed up. In 1999, Krettek et al. first coined the term poller screws after the small metal bollards that block and direct traffic. Poller screws were introduced as an adjunct to aid the union of metaphyseal long bone fractures during intramedullary nailing. However, as more evidence was published, the true effectiveness of poller screws was not appreciated, leading to split opinions. Through our research, we have built upon our understanding of poller screws, and we present a novel classification of poller screws over the years while exploring our novel technique and what we believe to be the fourth generation of poller screws. Currently, there is a paucity of research focussing on poller screws. However, studying the original evidence regarding poller screws through the most recent articles has demonstrated a confusion of research in this field. Therefore, we suggest a more organised approach to classify the use of poller screws.

Indexed as

intramedullary nailspoller screw

Identifiers

PMID38579780
PMCPMC11044090
OpenAlexW4393934212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.