Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38579720›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2024

Basal delamination during mouse gastrulation primes pluripotent cells for differentiation.

Nanami Sato, Viviane S Rosa, Aly Makhlouf, Helene Kretzmer, Abhishek Sampath Kumar, Stefanie Grosswendt, Alexandra L Mattei, Olivia Courbot, Steffen Wolf, Jerome Boulanger and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Three-dimensional stem cell models of mammalian gastrulation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nanami SatoMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Viviane S RosaMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Aly MakhloufMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Helene KretzmerMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Abhishek Sampath KumarMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie GrosswendtMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexandra L MatteiMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Olivia CourbotCell and Tissue Mechanobiology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK; Department of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Steffen WolfMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Jerome BoulangerMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Frederic LangevinMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Michal WiacekMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Daniel KarpinskiMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Alberto Elosegui-ArtolaCell and Tissue Mechanobiology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK; Department of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Alexander MeissnerMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Magdalena Zernicka-GoetzUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EL, UK; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Marta N ShahbaziMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK. Electronic address: mshahbazi@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK CC2214European Research Council 669198Medical Research Council CC2214Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/24Wellcome Trust 207415Wellcome Trust 207415/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust CC2214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blueprint of the mammalian body plan is laid out during gastrulation, when a trilaminar embryo is formed. This process entails a burst of proliferation, the ingression of embryonic epiblast cells at the primitive streak, and their priming toward primitive streak fates. How these different events are coordinated remains unknown. Here, we developed and characterized a 3D culture of self-renewing mouse embryonic cells that captures the main transcriptional and architectural features of the early gastrulating mouse epiblast. Using this system in combination with microfabrication and in vivo experiments, we found that proliferation-induced crowding triggers delamination of cells that express high levels of the apical polarity protein aPKC. Upon delamination, cells become more sensitive to Wnt signaling and upregulate the expression of primitive streak markers such as Brachyury. This mechanistic coupling between ingression and differentiation ensures that the right cell types become specified at the right place during embryonic development.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationGastrulationGerm LayersAnimalsBrachyury ProteinCell ProliferationEmbryo, MammalianFetal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMicePluripotent Stem CellsPrimitive StreakT-Box Domain ProteinsWnt Signaling PathwayBrachyury ProteinFetal ProteinsT-Box Domain Proteins3D culturedelaminationdifferentiationembryonic stem cellsgastrulationmorphogenesismouse embryopluripotencyproliferationWnt signaling

Identifiers

PMID38579720
PMCPMC7616279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.