ArticleJCO precision oncology2024
Repeat Next-Generation Sequencing Testing on Progression in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Can Identify New Actionable Alterations.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Germline and somatic testing for homologous repair deficiency in patients with prostate cancer (part 1 of 2).Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Guideline
- Factors Affecting Quality Control (QC) Failure Rates in Somatic Breast Cancer (BRCA) Gene Testing in Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer: Experiences From an Australian Cancer Care Centre.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA as Emerging Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Does Longitudinal Targeted Panel Sequencing Provide Clinically Relevant Information in Translocation-Associated Sarcomas?JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessing the Value of Sequential Next-Generation Sequencing and Multiple Molecular Tumor Board Reviews for Patients With Solid-Tumor Malignancies.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Homologous recombination repair genetic testing variables and diagnostic paths for prostate cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study.The oncologist · 2025Observational
- Expert opinion on the management of anemia in prostate cancer patients receiving PARP inhibitors.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Review
- Article
- A Podcast on Integrating Genetic Testing for Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Alterations in Patients with Prostate Cancer in the USA: a Multidisciplinary Approach to Overcoming the Obstacles.Targeted oncology · 2025Article
- Case Report WIN-MTB-2023001 WIN International Molecular Tumor Board A 62-year-old male with metastatic colorectal cancer with 5 prior lines of treatment.Oncotarget · 2025Article
- Inferred clonal hematopoiesis from tumor DNA sequencing among men with prostate cancer: correlation with somatic tumor alterations and outcomes.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating PARP Inhibitors in mCRPC Therapy: Current Strategies and Emerging Trends.Cancer management and research · 2024Review
- Cancer Biomarkers and Precision Oncology: A Review of Recent Trends and Innovations.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere are limited data available on the real-world patterns of molecular testing in men with advanced prostate cancer. We thus sought to evaluate next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in the United States, focused on single versus serial NGS testing, the different disease states of testing (hormone-sensitive
methodsThe Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort clinical-genomic database was used for this retrospective analysis, including 1,597 patients across 15 institutions. Actionable NGS data were defined as including somatic alterations in homologous recombination repair genes, mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability (MSI-high), or a high tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/MB.
resultsSerial NGS testing (two or more NGS tests with specimens collected more than 60 days apart) was performed in 9% (n = 144) of patients with a median of 182 days in between test results. For the second NGS test and beyond, 82.1% (225 of 274) of tests were from ctDNA assays and 76.1% (217 of 285) were collected in the metastatic castration-resistant setting. New actionable data were found on 11.1% (16 of 144) of second NGS tests, with 3.5% (5 of 144) of tests detecting a new
conclusionRepeat somatic NGS testing in men with prostate cancer is infrequently performed in practice and can identify new actionable alterations not present with initial testing, suggesting the utility of repeat molecular profiling with tissue or blood of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer to guide therapy choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.