Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38578792›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Clean energy transition and climate vulnerabilities: A comparative analysis of European and non-European developed countries.

Gong Caijuan, Muhammad Javeed Akhtar, Hafeez Ur Rehman, Khatib Ahmad Khan

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gong CaijuanSchool of Marxism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Muhammad Javeed AkhtarDepartment of Economics and Quantitative Methods, Dr. Hassan Murad School of Management, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0003-1932-0290
Hafeez Ur RehmanDepartment of Economics and Quantitative Methods, Dr. Hassan Murad School of Management, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Khatib Ahmad KhanSchool of Commerce and Management Studies, Sunrise University, Alwar, Rajasthan, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3412-6950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the world faces an existential threat of climate change, and every government across the globe is trying to come up with strategies to tackle the severity of climate change in every way possible. To this end, the use of clean energy rather than fossil fuel energy sources is critical, as it can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pave the way for carbon neutrality. This study examines the impact of the energy cleanability gap on four different climate vulnerabilities, such as ecosystem, food, health, and housing vulnerabilities, considering 47 European and non-European high-income countries. The study considers samples from 2002 to 2019. This study precedes the empirical analysis in the context of a quadratic relationship between the energy cleanability gap and climate vulnerability. The study uses system-generalized methods of the moment as the main technique, while panel quantile regression is a robustness analysis. Fixed effect and random effect models have also been incorporated. The study finds that the energy cleanability gap and all four climate vulnerabilities demonstrate a U-shaped relationship in both European and non-European countries, implying that when the energy cleanability gap increases, climate vulnerability decreases, but after reaching a certain threshold, it starts to increase. Development expenditure is found to be negatively affecting food and health vulnerabilities in European nations, while it increases food vulnerability and decreases health vulnerability in non-European nations. Regarding industrialization's impact on climate vulnerabilities, the study finds opposite effects for the European and non-European economies. On the other hand, for both groups, trade openness decreases climate vulnerabilities. Based on these results, the study recommends speeding up the energy transition process from fossil fuel energy resources towards clean energy resources to obtain carbon neutrality in both European and non-European groups.

Indexed as

EcosystemGreenhouse GasesCarbonCarbon DioxideDeveloped CountriesEconomic DevelopmentFossil FuelsRenewable EnergyCarbonCarbon DioxideFossil FuelsGreenhouse Gases

Identifiers

PMID38578792
PMCPMC10997114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.