Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38578758›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Natural zeolite for heavy metal, ammonia removal, and physiological responses in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles tanks with different densities.

Ghada R Sallam, Hadir A Aly, Ayman M Lotfy, Mohamed M Abdel-Rahim, Walied M Fayed, Islam I Teiba, Kumbukani Mzengereza, Mavuto Tembo, Wales Singini, Yusuf Jibril Habib and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ghada R SallamAquaculture Division, Fish Rearing Lab., National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Alexandria, Egypt.
Hadir A AlyAquaculture Division, Fish Rearing Lab., National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-6999
Ayman M LotfyAquaculture Division, Fish Rearing Lab., National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Alexandria, Egypt.
Mohamed M Abdel-RahimAquaculture Division, Fish Rearing Lab., National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2527-4780
Walied M FayedDepartment of Animal and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Islam I TeibaFaculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Kumbukani MzengerezaDepartment of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Mavuto TemboAfrican Center of Excellence in Neglected and Underutilized Biodiversity, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Wales SinginiAfrican Center of Excellence in Neglected and Underutilized Biodiversity, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Yusuf Jibril HabibDepartment of Medical Analysis, Tishk International University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Akram Ismael ShehataDepartment of Animal and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-0296
National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries · EGMzuzu University · MWAlexandria University · EGTanta University · EGTishk International University · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the influence of zeolite usage and stocking densities on various parameters, including ammonia removal from water, accumulation of heavy metals in fish organs, water quality, growth performance, feed efficiency, muscle composition, as well as hematological and biochemical parameters in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) over a 90-day duration. A total of 2400 D. labrax with an initial weight of 9.83 ± 2.02 g and initial length of 9.37 ± 0.32 cm were distributed among 24 tanks. The research involved six distinct treatment groups, with two different zeolite levels (0 and 15 ppt) and three stocking density levels (50, 100, and 150 fish/m3), each replicated four times. The results of the research demonstrate a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in water quality measures with the introduction of zeolite. The successful implementation of this amendment mitigated the adverse effects of fish density on water quality parameters. Higher stocking density negatively impacted European sea bass growth, feed utilization, and hemato-biochemical indicators. Zeolite use effectively alleviated these adverse effects, particularly on performance, feed utilization, hematological, and biochemical parameters. The study's results indicate that the utilization of zeolite has shown to be efficacious in mitigating the accumulation of heavy metals in both water and fish organs, while concurrently augmenting fish attributes. However, the increase in density led to a significant decrease in the accumulation of heavy metals in both water and fish organs. The present study highlights the capacity of natural zeolites to mitigate the negative consequences associated with water quality concerns. The efficiency of these zeolites in limiting the accessibility of heavy metals in polluted water is shown, hence minimizing their accumulation in fish organs. In addition, the improvement of fish performance has the capacity to have a beneficial influence on both the well-being and efficiency of fish in aquaculture. Additional research is essential to fully understand the complex molecular pathways involved in utilizing natural zeolite under different fish densities.

Indexed as

BassMetals, HeavyZeolitesAmmoniaAnimalsMusclesAmmoniaMetals, HeavyZeolites

Identifiers

PMID38578758
PMCPMC10997062
OpenAlexW4393976603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.