Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38578682›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Evaluating a Remotely Delivered Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Intervention for Patients With Breast Cancer (REMOTE-COR-B): Protocol for a Single-Arm Feasibility Trial.

Camille E Short, Jonathan C Rawstorn, Tamara L Jones, Lara Edbrooke, Sandra C Hayes, Ralph Maddison, Sophie Nightingale, Hilmy Ismail, Richard De Boer, Fiona Hegi-Johnson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Camille E ShortMelbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-4251
Jonathan C RawstornInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9755-7993
Tamara L JonesMelbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4854-0968
Lara EdbrookeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-5578
Sandra C HayesCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-5184
Ralph MaddisonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-5518
Sophie NightingaleDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-2629
Hilmy IsmailDepartment of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-787X
Richard De BoerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6986-2010
Fiona Hegi-JohnsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-8802
Aaron L SverdlovNewcastle Centre of Excellence in Cardio-Oncology, The University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2539-8038
Robyn BellConsumer representative, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7177-1688
Irene HalliganConsumer representative, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5260-0748
Linda DenehyDepartment of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-8436
The University of Melbourne · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUDeakin University · AUCancer Council Queensland · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise rehabilitation is a promising strategy for reducing cardiovascular disease risk among patients with breast cancer. However, the evidence is primarily derived from programs based at exercise centers with in-person supervised delivery. Conversely, most patients report a preference for home-based rehabilitation. As such, there is a clear need to explore strategies that can provide real-time supervision and coaching while addressing consumer preferences. Evidence from cardiac rehabilitation has demonstrated the noninferiority of a smartphone-based telerehabilitation approach (REMOTE-CR) to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in people with cardiovascular disease compared to a center-based program.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of the REMOTE-CR program adapted for patients with breast cancer at risk of cardiotoxicity (REMOTE-COR-B). We will also assess the satisfaction and usability of REMOTE-COR-B.

methodsWe will conduct a single-arm feasibility study of the REMOTE-COR-B program among patients with stage I-III breast cancer who are at risk of cardiotoxicity (taking treatment type and dose, as well as other common cardiovascular disease risk factors into account) and who are within 24 months of completing primary definitive treatment. Participants (target sample size of 40) will receive an 8-week smartphone-based telerehabilitation exercise program involving remotely delivered real-time supervision and behavior change support. The platform comprises a smartphone and wearable heart rate monitor, as well as a custom-built smartphone app and web application. Participants will be able to attend remotely monitored exercise sessions during set operating hours each week, scheduled in both the morning and evening. Adherence is the primary outcome of the trial, assessed through the number of remotely monitored exercise sessions attended compared to the trial target (ie, 3 sessions per week). Secondary outcomes include additional trial feasibility indicators (eg, recruitment and retention), safety, satisfaction, and usability, and objective and patient-reported efficacy outcomes (cardiovascular fitness, quality of life, fatigue, self-reported exercise, self-efficacy, habit strength, and motivation). Adherence, feasibility, and safety outcomes will be assessed during the intervention period; intervention satisfaction and usability will be assessed post intervention; and objective and patient-reported efficacy outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post intervention (2-month postbaseline assessment), and at follow-up (5-month postbaseline assessment).

resultsRecruitment for this trial commenced in March 2023, and 7 participants had been recruited as of the submission of the manuscript. The estimated completion date for the project is October 2024, with results expected to be published in mid-2025.

conclusionsThe REMOTE-COR-B intervention is a novel and promising approach to providing exercise therapy to patients with breast cancer at risk of cardiotoxicity who have unique needs and heightened safety risks. This project will provide important information on the extent to which this approach is satisfactory to patients with breast cancer, safe, and potentially effective, which is necessary before larger-scale research or clinical projects.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001557820; www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12621001557820.aspx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53301.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast cancer survivorcancercancer survivorcardiaccardiac rehabilitationcardiotoxicitycardiovascular diseasedigital healthefficacyexercisefeasibilityfitnessrehabilitationrehabilitation interventionsafety

Identifiers

PMID38578682
PMCPMC11031702
OpenAlexW4391039156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.