Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38578610›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Following Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The PETAL Phase Ib Study.

David J Pinato, Antonio D'Alessio, Claudia Angela Maria Fulgenzi, Alexandra Emilia Schlaak, Ciro Celsa, Saskia Killmer, Jesus Miguens Blanco, Caroline Ward, Charalampos-Vlasios Stikas, Mark R Openshaw and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. New Scenarios in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

David J Pinato *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-0103
Antonio D'Alessio *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-3671
Claudia Angela Maria Fulgenzi *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5654-9225
Alexandra Emilia Schlaak *Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5892-9224
Ciro CelsaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5662-2162
Saskia KillmerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-8538-9251
Jesus Miguens BlancoDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7725-965X
Caroline WardDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-3256-4515
Charalampos-Vlasios StikasDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-6470
Mark R OpenshawInstitute of Cancer and Genomics Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6973-3067
Nicole AcutiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-7064-6601
Georgios NteliopoulosDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9764-4288
Cristina BalcellsDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7927-5538
Hector C KeunDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-8851
Robert D GoldinCentre for Pathology, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5184-4519
Paul J RossDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-1886
Alessio CortelliniDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-5735
Robert ThomasInterventional Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-8373-0518
Anna-Mary YoungDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Georges University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-9040-5646
Nathan DanckertDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5416-7971
Paul TaitInterventional Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-2783-8069
Julian R MarchesiDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-5239
Bertram Bengsch *Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-740X
Rohini Sharma *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-549X
Hammersmith Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DECancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) RCCPDB- Nov21/100008Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (AIRC) AIRC MFAG 25697Roger Williams Foundation for Liver Disease Small Grant SchemeWellcome TrustWellcome Trust (WT) PS3416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may prime adaptive immunity and enhance immunotherapy efficacy. PETAL evaluated safety, preliminary activity of TACE plus pembrolizumab and explored mechanisms of efficacy. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were planned to receive up to two rounds of TACE followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days commencing 30 days post-TACE until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to 1 year. Primary endpoint was safety, with assessment window of 21 days from pembrolizumab initiation. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and evaluation of tumor and host determinants of response.

resultsFifteen patients were included in the safety and efficacy population: 73% had nonviral cirrhosis; median age was 72 years. Child-Pugh class was A in 14 patients. Median tumor size was 4 cm. Ten patients (67%) received pembrolizumab after one TACE; 5 patients after two (33%). Pembrolizumab yielded no synergistic toxicity nor dose-limiting toxicities post-TACE. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 93% of patients, most commonly skin rash (40%), fatigue, and diarrhea (27%). After a median follow-up of 38.5 months, objective response rate 12 weeks post-TACE was 53%. PFS rate at 12 weeks was 93% and median PFS was 8.95 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.30-NE (not estimable)]. Median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-8.3). Median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 11.6-NE). Dynamic changes in peripheral T-cell subsets, circulating tumor DNA, serum metabolites, and in stool bacterial profiles highlight potential mechanisms of action of multimodal therapy.

conclusionsTACE plus pembrolizumab was tolerable with no evidence of synergistic toxicity, encouraging further clinical development of immunotherapy alongside TACE.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, Immunologicalpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID38578610
PMCPMC11145164
OpenAlexW4393995519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.