Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38578521›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Expression of Cathepsin D in early-stage breast cancer and its prognostic and predictive value.

Inas Alhudiri, Christopher Nolan, Ian Ellis, Adam Elzagheid, Andrew Green, Caroline Chapman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Design and Preclinical Evaluation of FirstJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. N-glycosylation Modification of CTSD Affects Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inas AlhudiriBreast Pathology Research Group, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Christopher NolanBreast Pathology Research Group, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ian EllisBreast Pathology Research Group, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Adam ElzagheidGenetic Engineering Department, Libyan Biotechnology Research Centre, Tripoli, Libya.
Andrew GreenBreast Pathology Research Group, Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. andrew.green@nottingham.ac.uk.
Caroline ChapmanEastern Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCathepsin D is a proteolytic enzyme that is normally localized in the lysosomes and is involved in the malignant progression of breast cancer. There are conflicting results regarding Cathepsin D significance as prognostic and predictor marker in breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the expression and prognostic significance of Cathepsin D in early-stage breast cancer.

methodsExpression of Cathepsin D was assessed by immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays, in a large well-characterized series of early-stage operable breast cancer (n = 954) from Nottingham Primary Breast Carcinoma Series between the period of 1988 and 1998 who underwent primary surgery. Correlation of Cathepsin D expression with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis was evaluated.

resultsCathepsin D expression was positive in 71.2% (679/954) of breast cancer tumours. Positive expression of Cathepsin D was significantly associated with high histological grade (p = 0.007), pleomorphism (p = 0.002), poor Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) score (p < 0.002), recurrence (p = 0.005) and distant metastasis (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that Cathepsin D expression was significantly associated with shorter breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.001), higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.001) and distant metastasis (p < 0.0001). ER-positive tumours expressing Cathepsin D and treated with tamoxifen demonstrated a significantly higher risk of distant metastasis.

conclusionCathepsin D expression significantly predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer and is associated with variables of poor prognosis and shorter outcome. The strong association of Cathepsin D with aggressive tumour characteristics and poor outcomes warrants further research of its potential as a therapeutic target The results also suggest a possible interaction between Cathepsin D and tamoxifen therapy in ER-positive breast cancer which needs further investigation to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCathepsin DNeoplasm StagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCathepsin DCTSD protein, humanBreast cancerCathepsin DImmunohistochemistryPrognosisTissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID38578521
PMCPMC11182851
OpenAlexW4393994863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.