Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38578506›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Patterns of failure in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer of Northeastern region of India: a retrospective observational study.

Mouchumee Bhattacharyya, Partha Pratim Medhi, Prashasti Sharma, Jyotiman Nath, Apurba Kumar Kalita, Partha Sarathi Roy, Tashnin Rahman, Yanpothung Yanthan

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mouchumee BhattacharyyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Partha Pratim MedhiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Prashasti SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India. prashasti1993@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7186-0003
Jyotiman NathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Apurba Kumar KalitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Partha Sarathi RoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Tashnin RahmanDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Yanpothung YanthanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to analyze patterns of failure and disease volume-treatment outcomes in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with definitive radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy at a tertiary cancer centre in northeast India.

methodsFrom February 2018 to February 2022, 99 histopathologically proved non-metastatic NPC patients treated with curative-intent RT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Locally advanced patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of various prognostic factors on locoregional free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meir curves compared outcome variables based on ROC analysis-classified tumor volume.

resultsDuring a median follow up of 25.4 months (17.3-39.2), 35(35.4%) patients developed recurrence. Twenty-three patients developed locoregional failures, of which 11 were in-field; 12 patient showed an out-field failure. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS was 71.10%, 70.90%, 64.10% and 74.10% respectively. There was statistically significant difference in LRFS according to T staging (p < 0.0001). Gross tumor volume (GTVp) and gross nodal volume (GTVn) were an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. The cut-off volumes for GTVp and GTVn for distant metastases and locoregional failure, respectively, were found to be 13 and 22.7 mL and 3.7 and 39.2 mL, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. Based on this, 99 patients were divided into three subgroups. OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups for GTVp (p = 0.03) and GTVn (p = 0.00024).

conclusionsFor NPC patients who undergo curative IMRT, primary tumour and nodal volumes are independent prognostic indicators. GTVp and GTVn are highly predictive of local control, distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This justifies their use as quantitative prognostic indicator for NPC.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureTumor BurdenFailureIMRTMetastasisNasopharyngeal cancerPrognosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID38578506
OpenAlexW4393994390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.