ArticleNeuro-oncology2024
Treatment response as surrogate to predict risk for disease progression in pediatric medulloblastoma with persistent magnetic resonance imaging lesions after first-line treatment.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims at clarifying the impact of persistent residual lesions following first-line treatment for pediatric medulloblastoma.
methodsData on 84 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma and persistent residual lesions on centrally reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the end of first-line therapy were analyzed.
resultsTwenty patients (23.8%) had residual lesions in the tumor bed (R+/M0), 51 (60.7%) had distant lesions (R0/M+) and 13 (15.5%) had both (R+/M+). Overall response to first-line therapy was minor or partial (≥ 25% reduction, minor response [MR]/PR) for 64 (76.2%) and stable disease (SD) for 20 patients (23.8%). Five-year post-primary-treatment progression-free (pptPFS) and overall survival (pptOS) were superior after MR/PR (pptPFS: 62.5 ± 7.0%[MR/PR] vs. 35.9 ± 12.8%[SD], P = .03; pptOS: 79.7 ± 5.9[MR/PR] vs. 55.5 ± 13.9[SD], P = .04). Furthermore, R+/M + was associated with a higher risk for progression (5-year pptPFS: 22.9 ± 17.9%[R+, M+] vs. 72.4 ± 12.0%[R+, M0]; P = .03). Watch-and-wait was pursued in 58 patients, while n = 26 received additional treatments (chemotherapy only, n = 19; surgery only, n = 2; combined, n = 3; valproic acid, n = 2), and their outcomes were not superior to watch-and-wait (5-year pptPFS: 58.5 ± 7.7% vs. 51.6 ± 10.7% P = .71; 5-year pptOS: 76.3 ± 6.9% vs. 69.8 ± 9.7%, P = .74). For the whole cohort, 5-year pptPFS by molecular subgroup (58 cases) were WNT: 100%, SHH: 50.0 ± 35.4%, group-4, 52.5 ± 10.5, group-3 54.2 ± 13.8%; (P = .08).
conclusionsOverall response and extent of lesions can function as surrogate parameters to predict outcomes in pediatric MB patients with persistent lesions after first-line therapy. Especially in the case of solitary persistent medulloblastoma MRI lesions, additional therapy was not beneficial. Therefore, treatment response, extent/kind of residual lesions and further diagnostic information need consideration for indication of additional treatments for persisting lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.