ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2024
The alteration of fecal microbial and metabolic profile of gallstone patients in Taiwan: Single-center study.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Veillonella, Neisseria, Prevotella, and Lachnoanaerobaculum enrichment in salivary microbiome predicts gallstone disease.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Cholecystectomy-induced gut dysbiosis and its consequences: bridging animal models and clinical outcomes in narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids in gallstones: mechanisms and intervention strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGallstone disease is a common health problem worldwide. The role of the gut microbiota in gallstone pathogenesis remains obscure. Our aim was to evaluate the association and crosstalk between gut microbiota, gut metabolomic, and metabolic parameters in cholesterol gallstone patients, pigmented gallstone patients, and controls.
methodsWe collected stool samples from healthy individuals and patients with gallstones in our hospital from March 2019 to February 2021. 16s rRNA sequencing was performed, followed by differential abundance analyses. Measurement of bile acids and short-chain fatty acids was conducted via targeted metabolomics.
resultThirty healthy individuals and 20 gallstone patients were recruited. The intergroup difference of microbial composition was significant between control and gallstone patients. The control group had more abundant Faecalibacterium , Prevotella 9 , and Bacteroides plebeius DSM 17135 . The cholesterol stones group had higher Desulfovibrionaceae and Bacteroides uniformis than the other two groups, while the pigment stone group had more abundant Escherichia-Shigella . In the analysis of metabolites, only n-butyric acid had a significantly higher concentration in the controls than in the gallstone group ( p < 0.01). The level of 3α-hydroxy-12 ketolithocholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and cholic acid showed no intergroup differences but was correlated to the serum cholesterol level and bacterial richness and evenness.
conclusionOur study revealed the key taxa that can discriminate between individuals with or without gallstones. We also identified metabolites that are possibly associated with metabolic parameter and bacterial diversity. However, the correlation of the metabolites to certain clusters of bacteria should be analyzed in a larger cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.