Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577879›Full record

SynthesisGlobal health action2024

Multisectoral interventions for urban health in Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Meelan Thondoo, Ebele R I Mogo, Lambed Tatah, Monica Muti, Kim R van Daalen, Trish Muzenda, Rachel Boscott, Omar Uwais, George Farmer, Adelaide Yue and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Meelan ThondooMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-3123
Ebele R I MogoMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0880-0750
Lambed TatahMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-6917
Monica MutiSA MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kim R van DaalenBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6955-9708
Trish MuzendaMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel BoscottMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Omar UwaisMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
George FarmerMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Adelaide YueMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah DalzellMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gudani MukomaSA MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Divya BhagtaniMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sostina MatinaSA MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-8423
Philip M DambisyaHealth Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kufre OkopChronic Disease Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0841-4588
Charles EbikemeLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Lisa MicklesfieldSA MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-0779
Tolu OniMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4499-1910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that urban health objectives are best achieved through a multisectoral approach. This approach requires multiple sectors to consider health and well-being as a central aspect of their policy development and implementation, recognising that numerous determinants of health lie outside (or beyond the confines of) the health sector. However, collaboration across sectors remains scarce and multisectoral interventions to support health are lacking in Africa. To address this gap in research, we conducted a mixed-method systematic review of multisectoral interventions aimed at enhancing health, with a particular focus on non-communicable diseases in urban African settings. Africa is the world's fastest urbanising region, making it a critical context in which to examine the impact of multisectoral approaches to improve health. This systematic review provides a valuable overview of current knowledge on multisectoral urban health interventions and enables the identification of existing knowledge gaps, and consequently, avenues for future research. We searched four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Global Health) for evidence dated 1989-2019 and identified grey literature from expert input. We identified 53 articles (17 quantitative, 20 qualitative, 12 mixed methods) involving collaborations across 22 sectors and 16 African countries. The principle guiding the majority of the multisectoral interventions was community health equity (39.6%), followed by healthy cities and healthy urban governance principles (32.1%). Targeted health outcomes were diverse, spanning behaviour, environmental and active participation from communities. With only 2% of all studies focusing on health equity as an outcome and with 47% of studies published by first authors located outside Africa, this review underlines the need for future research to prioritise equity both in terms of research outcomes and processes. A synthesised framework of seven interconnected components showcases an ecosystem on multisectoral interventions for urban health that can be examined in the future research in African urban settings that can benefit the health of people and the planet.Paper Context

Indexed as

Urban HealthAfricaCitiesHealth PolicyHumansAfricacitiesmultisectoral actionnon-communicable diseasesUrban health

Identifiers

PMID38577879
PMCPMC11000616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.