Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577542›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Node-degree aware edge sampling mitigates inflated classification performance in biomedical random walk-based graph representation learning.

Luca Cappelletti, Lauren Rekerle, Tommaso Fontana, Peter Hansen, Elena Casiraghi, Vida Ravanmehr, Christopher J Mungall, Jeremy J Yang, Leonard Spranger, Guy Karlebach and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bias-aware training and evaluation of link prediction algorithms in network biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Natural Product-Drug Interactions with Knowledge Graph Embeddings.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luca CappellettiAnacletoLab, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1269-2038
Lauren RekerleThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-6622
Tommaso FontanaAnacletoLab, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-3493
Peter HansenThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-2845
Elena CasiraghiAnacletoLab, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2024-7572
Vida RavanmehrThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-1083
Christopher J MungallDivision of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94710, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-2165
Jeremy J YangDepartment of Internal Medicine and UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNM School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87102, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1476-6192
Leonard SprangerInstitute of Bioinformatics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-2961
Guy KarlebachThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-8206
J Harry CaufieldDivision of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94710, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-7831
Leigh CarmodyThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7941-2961
Ben ColemanThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4422-1708
Tudor I OpreaDepartment of Internal Medicine and UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNM School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87102, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-6976
Justin ReeseDivision of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94710, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-2250
Giorgio ValentiniAnacletoLab, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-3919
Peter N RobinsonThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, CT 06032, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-9199

Funding

Illuminating the Druggable Genome by Knowledge GraphsU01CA239108 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J, OPREA, TUDOR I · 2019 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Graph representation learning is a family of related approaches that learn low-dimensional vector representations of nodes and other graph elements called embeddings. Embeddings approximate characteristics of the graph and can be used for a variety of machine-learning tasks such as novel edge prediction. For many biomedical applications, partial knowledge exists about positive edges that represent relationships between pairs of entities, but little to no knowledge is available about negative edges that represent the explicit lack of a relationship between two nodes. For this reason, classification procedures are forced to assume that the vast majority of unlabeled edges are negative. Existing approaches to sampling negative edges for training and evaluating classifiers do so by uniformly sampling pairs of nodes. Results: We show here that this sampling strategy typically leads to sets of positive and negative examples with imbalanced node degree distributions. Using representative heterogeneous biomedical knowledge graph and random walk-based graph machine learning, we show that this strategy substantially impacts classification performance. If users of graph machine-learning models apply the models to prioritize examples that are drawn from approximately the same distribution as the positive examples are, then performance of models as estimated in the validation phase may be artificially inflated. We present a degree-aware node sampling approach that mitigates this effect and is simple to implement. Availability and implementation: Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/monarch-initiative/negativeExampleSelection.

Identifiers

PMID38577542
PMCPMC10994718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.