ReviewChemical science2024
Structural engineering of atomic catalysts for electrocatalysis.
Review in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional Soft Catalysts for Improved Power Performance of Li-S Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Rational Electrocatalyst Design for Coupled Hydrogen Evolution and Alcohol Oxidation with In Situ Perspective.Small methods · 2026Review
- Reversible polarization-enabled hydrogen evolution reaction on two-dimensional ferroelectric CuChemical science · 2026Article
- Design strategies for dual-atom and multi-atom catalysts: Unlocking synergistic interactions in carbon-based electrocatalysis.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Ionomers modulate the microenvironment in electrocatalytic COChemical science · 2026Review
- Exploring the Influence of Electronic Structure on Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Review
- Reconstruction chemistry of electrocatalysts under working conditions.Chemical science · 2025Review
- First-Principles Study on the CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bimetallic effects in carbon dioxide electroreduction.Chemical science · 2025Review
- A Review of Surface Reconstruction and Transformation of 3d Transition-Metal (oxy)Hydroxides and Spinel-Type Oxides during the Oxygen Evolution Reaction.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Lateral nanoarchitectonics from nano to life: ongoing challenges in interfacial chemical science.Chemical science · 2024Review
- Built-in electrophilic/nucleophilic domain of nitrogen-doped carbon nanofiber-confined NiChemical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a burgeoning category of heterogeneous catalysts, atomic catalysts have been extensively researched in the field of electrocatalysis. To satisfy different electrocatalytic reactions, single-atom catalysts (SACs), diatomic catalysts (DACs) and triatomic catalysts (TACs) have been successfully designed and synthesized, in which microenvironment structure regulation is the core to achieve high-efficiency catalytic activity and selectivity. In this review, the effect of the geometric and electronic structure of metal active centers on catalytic performance is systematically introduced, including substrates, central metal atoms, and the coordination environment. Then theoretical understanding of atomic catalysts for electrocatalysis is innovatively discussed, including synergistic effects, defect coupled spin state change and crystal field distortion spin state change. In addition, we propose the challenges to optimize atomic catalysts for electrocatalysis applications, including controlled synthesis, increasing the density of active sites, enhancing intrinsic activity, and improving the stability. Moreover, the structure-function relationships of atomic catalysts in the CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.