Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577363›Full record

ArticleChemical science2024

Transfer learning for a foundational chemistry model.

Emma King-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Carbohydrate Synthesis is Entering the Data-Driven Digital Era.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emma King-SmithCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge Cambridge UK esk34@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-0955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-driven chemistry has garnered much interest concurrent with improvements in hardware and the development of new machine learning models. However, obtaining sufficiently large, accurate datasets of a desired chemical outcome for data-driven chemistry remains a challenge. The community has made significant efforts to democratize and curate available information for more facile machine learning applications, but the limiting factor is usually the laborious nature of generating large-scale data. Transfer learning has been noted in certain applications to alleviate some of the data burden, but this protocol is typically carried out on a case-by-case basis, with the transfer learning task expertly chosen to fit the finetuning. Herein, I develop a machine learning framework capable of accurate chemistry-relevant prediction amid general sources of low data. First, a chemical "foundational model" is trained using a dataset of ∼1 million experimental organic crystal structures. A task specific module is then stacked atop this foundational model and subjected to finetuning. This approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on a diverse set of tasks: toxicity prediction, yield prediction, and odor prediction.

Identifiers

PMID38577363
PMCPMC10988575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.