Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577323›Full record

ReviewNanotheranostics2024

Characterizing morphological alterations in blood related disorders through Atomic Force Microscopy.

Rohini Rakshak, Shweta Bhatt, Sushant Sharma, Rutesh Agharkar, Santosh Bodakhe, Rohit Srivastava

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanotheranostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rohini RakshakDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Shweta BhattDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Sushant SharmaDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Rutesh AgharkarDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Santosh BodakheDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Rohit SrivastavaDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a very flexible method that can create topographical images from a range of materials and image surfaces. Significantly, AFM has emerged as an invaluable tool for dissecting the morphology and biochemical aspects of body cells and tissues. The high-resolution imaging capabilities of AFM enable researchers to discern alterations in cell morphology and understand the underlying mechanisms of diseases. It contributes to understanding disease etiology and progression. In the context of this review, our focus will be directed towards elucidating the pivotal role of AFM in analysis of blood related disorders. Through detailed comparisons with normal cells, we delve into the alterations in size, shape, and surface characteristics induced by conditions such as cancer, diabetes, anaemia, and infections caused by pathogens. In essence, various work described in this article highlights to bridge the gap between traditional microscopy and in-depth analysis of blood-related pathologies, which in turn offers valuable perspectives for both research and clinical applications in the field.

Indexed as

Hematologic DiseasesMicroscopy, Atomic ForceHumansAFMAnemiaBlood related disordersCancerDiabetesDiagnosisGeneticsPathogensTherapy

Identifiers

PMID38577323
PMCPMC10988212
OpenAlexW4393905345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.