Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577273›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Predicting mechanical neck pain intensity in computer professionals using machine learning: identification and correlation of key features.

Fatima Khanum, Abdur Raheem Khan, Ashfaque Khan, Aafreen Aafreen, Akhlaque Ahmad Khan, Ausaf Ahmad, Syed Mohammad Fauzan Akhtar, Omar Farooq, Mohammad Abu Shaphe, Mohammed M Alshehri and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fatima KhanumDepartment of Physiotherapy, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Abdur Raheem KhanDepartment of Physiotherapy, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Ashfaque KhanDepartment of Physiotherapy, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Aafreen AafreenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Akhlaque Ahmad KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Ausaf AhmadDepartment of Community Medicine, IIMS&R, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Syed Mohammad Fauzan AkhtarIIMSR, IIAHSR, IIANSR, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Omar FarooqDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Mohammad Abu ShapheDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed M AlshehriDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Fazal Imam ShahiDeanship of E-Learning & Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulfattah S AlqahtaniDepartment of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashwag AlbakriDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science & Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Sakher M ObaidatDepartment of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, The Hashemite University, Zaraq, Jordan.
Integral University · INAligarh Muslim University · INHashemite University · JOJazan University · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical neck pain has become prevalent among computer professionals possibly because of prolonged computer use. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between neck pain intensity, anthropometric metrics, cervical range of motion, and related disabilities using advanced machine learning techniques. Method: This study involved 75 computer professionals, comprising 27 men and 48 women, aged between 25 and 44 years, all of whom reported neck pain following extended computer sessions. The study utilized various tools, including the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain measurement, anthropometric tools for body metrics, a Universal Goniometer for cervical ROM, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). For data analysis, the study employed SPSS (v16.0) for basic statistics and a suite of machine-learning algorithms to discern feature importance. The capability of the kNN algorithm is evaluated using its confusion matrix. Results: The "NDI Score (%)" consistently emerged as the most significant feature across various algorithms, while metrics like age and computer usage hours varied in their rankings. Anthropometric results, such as BMI and body circumference, did not maintain consistent ranks across algorithms. The confusion matrix notably demonstrated its classification process for different VAS scores (mild, moderate, and severe). The findings indicated that 56% of the pain intensity, as measured by the VAS, could be accurately predicted by the dataset. Discussion: Machine learning clarifies the system dynamics of neck pain among computer professionals and highlights the need for different algorithms to gain a comprehensive understanding. Such insights pave the way for creating tailored ergonomic solutions and health campaigns for this population.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeNeck PainAdultComputersFemaleHumansMalePain Measurementanthropometrycervical range of motioncomputer professionalsmachine learningneck disability indexneck pain

Identifiers

PMID38577273
PMCPMC10993996
OpenAlexW4393037320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.