ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Association between gasping and survival among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The SOS-KANTO 2017 study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential return of spontaneous circulation in Japanese out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with pseudo-pulseless electrical activity: a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicentric study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Association between agonal breathing and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of gasp frequency combined with echocardiography for assessing cardiac arrest and myocardial function during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in rats.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- The Association Between Signs of Life and Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess the association between gasping and survival among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients requiring extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Methods: This prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted between 2019 and 2021. We categorized adult patients requiring ECPR into those with or without gasping prior to hospital arrival. The primary outcome was the 30-day survival. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses fitted with generalized estimating equations and subgroup analyses based on the initial rhythm and age. Results: Of the 9,909 patients with OHCA requiring ECPR, 332 were enrolled in the present study, including 92 (27.7%) and 240 (72.3%) with and without gasping, respectively. The 30-day survival was higher in patients with gasping than in those without gasping (35.9% [33/92] vs. 16.2% [39/240]). In the logistic regression analysis, gasping was significantly associated with improved 30-day survival (adjusted odds ratio: 3.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-5.51). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar trends in patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm and older age. Conclusions: Gasping was associated with improved survival in OHCA patients requiring ECPR, even those with an initial non-shockable rhythm and older age. Clinicians may select the candidates for ECPR appropriately based on the presence of gasping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.