Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

I understand your pain but I do not feel it: lower affective empathy in response to others' social pain in narcissism.

Fatemeh Shahri, Abbas Zabihzadeh, Alireza Taqipanahi, Morteza Erfani Haromi, Mobina Rasouli, Asal Saeidi Nik, Clare M Eddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatemeh ShahriDepartment of Psychology, Shahid Behashti University, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas ZabihzadehDepartment of Psychology, Shahid Behashti University, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza TaqipanahiInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza Erfani HaromiInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Mobina Rasouli *Department of Psychology, Shahid Behashti University, Tehran, Iran.
Asal Saeidi Nik *Department of Psychology, Shahid Behashti University, Tehran, Iran.
Clare M EddyCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While the relationship between narcissism and empathy has been well-researched, studies have paid less attention to empathic accuracy, i.e., appreciating the precise strength of another person's emotions, and self-other distinction, in terms of the disparity between affective ratings for self and other in response to emotive stimuli. Furthermore, empathic responses may vary depending on whether the pain is physical or social. Methods: We investigated empathic accuracy, affective empathy, and the distinction between pain, emotion and intensity ratings for self and other, in high ( Results and discussion: The HNG displayed lower affective empathy and empathic accuracy than the LNG for both pain types. Within the HNG there was higher empathic accuracy for social vs. physical pain, despite reduced affective empathy for social pain, in contrast to the LNG. In addition to this paradox, the HNG demonstrated greater differences between ratings for the self and for target others than the LNG, suggesting that narcissism is associated with higher self-other distinction in response to viewing other people describing social pain.

Indexed as

affective empathycognitive empathyempathic accuracynarcissismphysical painself-other distinctionsocial pain

Identifiers

PMID38577113
PMCPMC10994002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.