Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577065›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024

A slight degree of osteoarthritis appears to be present after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with contralateral healthy knees at a minimum of 20 years: A systematic review of the literature.

Riccardo D'Ambrosi, Alessandro Carrozzo, Amit Meena, Katia Corona, Amit Kumar Yadav, Alessandro Annibaldi, Srinivas B S Kambhampati, Elisabeth Abermann, Christian Fink

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Riccardo D'AmbrosiIRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Milan Italy.
Alessandro CarrozzoOrthopaedic Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital University of Rome La Sapienza Rome Italy.
Amit MeenaDivision of Orthopedics Shalby Multi-Specialty Hospital Jaipur India.
Katia CoronaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio" University of Molise Campobasso Italy.
Amit Kumar YadavWrightington Hospital Wigan UK.
Alessandro AnnibaldiOrthopaedic Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital University of Rome La Sapienza Rome Italy.
Srinivas B S KambhampatiSri Dhaatri Orthopaedic Maternity & Gynaecology Center, SKDGOC Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh India.
Elisabeth AbermannGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence Innsbruck Austria.
Christian FinkGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence Innsbruck Austria.
Gelenkpunkt · ATShalby Hospitals · INUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Molise · ITWrightington Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present systematic review was to quantitatively synthesize the best literature evidence regarding osteoarthritis developing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), including only studies with a follow-up duration of at least 20 years. Material and Methods: A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane Library). The outcome measures extracted from the studies were failure rate, subsequent knee surgery on the same knee, radiographic development of osteoarthritis measured with Kellgren-Lawrence, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) radiographic score and Ahlbäck classification. The health of both the ACLR knee and the contralateral knee was compared. Results: A total of 1552 patients were included in the study, of which 1290 (83.11%) were operated on using a patellar tendon graft, 190 (12.24%) with hamstrings, 27 (1.73%) with an iliotibial band and 45 (2.89%) with patellar tendon plus a ligament augmentation device (LAD). The mean age at the time of surgery was 25.18 ± 1.91 years, and the mean follow-up time was 23.34 ± 2.56 years. Analysing IDKC Score at final follow-up, ACLR Group showed a higher degree of OA compared with contralateral healthy knee ( Conclusions: ACL reconstruction appears to result in mild osteoarthritis in the long term in most of the patients and only less than 33.2% develop a moderate to severe degree of knee OA according to IKDC radiographic score. A slight degree of osteoarthritis appears to be present in ACLR knees compared with contralateral healthy knees. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

Ahlbäckanterior cruciate ligamentfailure rateIKDCKellgren–Lawrencekneeosteoarthritisradiographic

Identifiers

PMID38577065
PMCPMC10993150
OpenAlexW4393941268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.