Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577038›Full record

ReviewSkin health and disease2024

Targeted review of

James G Krueger, Anna Pagotto, Samuel Haftel, Birgit Gradl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Targeted review ofSkin health and disease · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

James G KruegerLaboratory for Investigative Dermatology The Rockefeller University New York New York USA.
Anna PagottoSymmetron Limited London UK.
Samuel HaftelSymmetron Limited London UK.
Birgit GradlBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH Ingelheim am Rhein Germany.
Sytronics (United States) · USBoehringer Ingelheim (China) · CNRockefeller University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and chronic skin disease historically treated with therapies that were originally intended to treat plaque psoriasis (PsO). However, GPP and plaque PsO have distinct pathogeneses and clinical courses. Objectives: This study aimed to further characterise the unique genetic background of GPP by summarising evidence on the frequency and type of Methods and Results: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting Conclusion: Considering the differences between GPP and plaque PsO in aetiology and disease symptoms, effective, GPP-specific treatment options are needed, and recent research suggests that blockade of IL-36 signalling may be an effective target for treatment of GPP.

Identifiers

PMID38577038
PMCPMC10988704
OpenAlexW4392516215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.