Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577030›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Teams in Transition: Increasing Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Antimicrobial Use and Infectious Diseases Consultation.

Reinaldo Perez, Michael E Yarrington, Connor R Deri, Michael J Smith, Jillian Hayes, Rebekah H Wrenn, Rebekah W Moehring

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reinaldo PerezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-8480
Michael E YarringtonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1519
Connor R DeriDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-1197
Michael J SmithDepartment of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jillian HayesDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-5136
Rebekah H WrennDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rebekah W MoehringDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advanced practice providers (APPs) have taken on increasing responsibilities as primary team members in acute care hospitals, but the impact of this practice shift on antimicrobial prescribing and infectious diseases (ID) consultation requests is unknown. Here we describe longitudinal trends in antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) and ID consultation by attributed provider type in 3 hospitals. Methods: We performed a retrospective time series analysis of antimicrobial use and ID consultation from July 2015 to June 2022 at a major university hospital and 2 community hospitals. We evaluated antimicrobial DOT and ID consultation over time and assessed attribution to 3 groups of providers: attending physicians, trainees, and APPs. We used multinomial logistic regression to measure changes in percentage of DOT and ID consultation across the clinician groups over time using physicians as the referent. Results: Baseline distribution of antimicrobial DOT and ID consultation varied by practice setting, but all subgroups showed increases in the proportion attributable to APPs. Large increases were seen in the rate of ID consultation, increasing by >30% during the study period. At our university hospital, by study end >40% of new ID consults and restricted antimicrobial days were attributed to APPs. Conclusions: Hospitals had differing baseline patterns of DOT attributed to provider groups, but all experienced increases in DOT attributed to APPs. Similar increases were seen in changes to ID consultation. APPs have increasing involvement in antimicrobial use decisions in the inpatient setting and should be engaged in future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Indexed as

advanced practice providerantimicrobial days of therapyantimicrobial stewardshipID consultaitoninterdisciplinary teams

Identifiers

PMID38577030
PMCPMC10993059
OpenAlexW4393940508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.