Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576998›Full record

ArticleNon-coding RNA research2024

Predicting prostate cancer progression with a Multi-lncRNA expression-based risk score and nomogram integrating ISUP grading.

Sabrina Ledesma-Bazan, Florencia Cascardo, Juan Bizzotto, Santiago Olszevicki, Elba Vazquez, Geraldine Gueron, Javier Cotignola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Non-coding RNA research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina Ledesma-BazanUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Florencia CascardoUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan BizzottoUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago OlszevickiUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Elba VazquezUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Geraldine GueronUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Javier CotignolaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease; therefore, estimating patient prognosis accurately is challenging due to the lack of biomarkers with sufficient specificity and sensitivity. One of the current challenges lies in integrating genomic and transcriptomic data with clinico-pathological features and in incorporating their application in everyday clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to model a risk score and nomogram containing long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression and clinico-pathological data to better predict the probability of prostate cancer progression. We performed bioinformatics analyses to identify lncRNAs differentially expressed across various prostate cancer stages and associated with progression-free survival. This information was further integrated into a prognostic risk score and nomogram containing transcriptomic and clinico-pathological features to estimate the risk of disease progression. We used RNA-seq data from 5 datasets from public repositories (total n = 178) comprising different stages of prostate cancer: pre-treatment primary prostate adenocarcinomas, post-treatment tumors and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. We found 30 lncRNAs with consistent differential expression in all comparisons made using two R-based packages. Multivariate progression-free survival analysis including the ISUP group as covariate, revealed that 7/30 lncRNAs were significantly associated with time-to-progression. Next, we combined the expression of these 7 lncRNAs into a multi-lncRNA score and dichotomized the patients into low- or high-score. Patients with a high-score showed a 4-fold risk of disease progression (HR = 4.30, 95 %CI = 2.66-6.97, p = 3.1e-9). Furthermore, we modelled a combined risk-score containing information on the multi-lncRNA score and ISUP group. We found that patients with a high-risk score had nearly 8-fold risk of progression (HR = 7.65, 95 %CI = 4.05-14.44, p = 3.4e-10). Finally, we created and validated a nomogram to help uro-oncologists to better predict patient's risk of progression at 3- and 5-years post-diagnosis. In conclusion, the integration of lncRNA expression data and clinico-pathological features of prostate tumors into predictive models might aid in tailored disease risk assessment and treatment for patients with prostate cancer.

Identifiers

PMID38576998
PMCPMC10993238
OpenAlexW4391133852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.