Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576948›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Digital eye strain and its associated factors among radiology physicians in Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey using logistic regression analysis.

Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Ummey Aymen, Qasim Mehmood, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Usha Kumari, Zair Hassan, Nasreen Naz, Nida Rafiq, Muhammad Tayyeb, Irfan Ullah and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad Junaid TahirLahore General Hospital.
Ummey AymenDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi.
Qasim MehmoodKing Edward Medical University, Lahore.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharMayo Clinic-Rochester, MN.
Usha KumariDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi.
Zair HassanLady Reading Hospital.
Nasreen NazDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi.
Nida RafiqDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi.
Muhammad TayyebBacha Khan Medical College, Mardan, Pakistan.
Irfan UllahKabir Medical College, Gandhara University, Peshawar.
Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed AhmedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0003-4608-5321
Osamah AlwalidDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKBacha Khan University · PKGandhara University · PKKing Edward Medical University · PKLady Reading Hospital · PKLahore General Hospital · PKMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Khartoum · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Increased use of digital devices in the modern era has led to the development of digital eye strain (DES) or computer vision syndrome in their users. This can result in the development of various ocular and visual symptoms among them. In this study, the authors aimed to view the prevalence of digital eye strain among radiology physicians in Pakistan and their associated risk factors. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate occupational DES among radiology physicians in Pakistan. The data collection was done using the convenience sampling technique, and the data were analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 25.0. Results: Out of the 247 respondents, 33.6% were males and 66.4% were females. 41.7% of them were between 30 and 40 years of age and 51.8% of them were radiology residents. 52.2% of the participants had a refractive error and were using a corrective lens. The majority of the radiologists in our study (84.2%) preferred picture archiving and communication system (PACS) over films and 82.2% of them reported having breaks of less than 15 min. Major symptoms reported by the participants were tired or heavy eyes (69.6%) and headache (69.3%). The proportion of developing DES was higher in females [ Conclusion: With recent advances in the field of radiology in Pakistan, the frequency of developing DES among radiologists is increasing. Being a female, having long working hours, and having noticeable flickers on the digital screens were among the significant factors in developing DES among radiologists.

Indexed as

computer vision syndromeradiographsradiologyscreenteleradiologyvisual disorder

Identifiers

PMID38576948
PMCPMC10990352
OpenAlexW4392437829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.