ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Reducing Osteopenia of Prematurity-related Fractures in a Level IV NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fractures Associated with Metabolic Bone Disease in Extremely Preterm and Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Before and After a Bone Health Program.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Fractures Secondary to Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteopenia of prematurity (OOP) is often a silent disease in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Despite its association with increased neonatal morbidity, such as fractures, wide variation exists in screening, diagnostic, and management practices. We sought to decrease the rate of OOP-related fractures in our level IV NICU by 20% within 1 year. Methods: A multidisciplinary quality improvement team identified inconsistent screening, diagnosis, and management of OOP, as well as handling of at-risk patients, as primary drivers for OOP-related fractures. Using the model for improvement, we implemented sequential interventions, including screening, diagnosis, and a management algorithm as a "handle-with-care" bundle in infants at risk for fractures. Results: 194 at-risk infants were included, 59 of whom had OOP. There was special cause variation in OOP-related fractures, with a reduction from 0.43 per 1000 patient days to 0.06 per 1000 patient days with our interventions. There was also an improvement in days between fractures from 62 to 337 days. We achieved these improvements despite a similar prevalence of OOP throughout the initiative. We showed special cause variation with increased patients between missed OOP documentation and improved collection of OOP screening laboratories at 4 weeks of life without increased blood testing. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary team approach with standardized OOP screening, diagnosis, and management guidelines, including a handle-with-care bundle, reduces OOP-related fractures in a level IV NICU.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.