ArticlePediatric quality & safety
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Minimize Unnecessary Chest X-Ray Utilization in Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving patient outcomes through quality improvement and safety culture interventions in pediatric emergency care: a systematic review of best practices.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current national guidelines recommend against chest X-rays (CXRs) for patients with acute asthma exacerbation (AAE). The overuse of CXRs in AAE has become a concern, prompting the need for a quality improvement (QI) project to decrease CXR usage through guideline-based interventions. We aimed to reduce the percentage of CXRs not adhering to national guidelines obtained for pediatric patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with AAE by 50% within 12 months of project initiation. Methods: We conducted this study at a New York City urban level-2 trauma center. The team was composed of members from the ED and pediatric departments. Electronic medical records of children aged 2 to 18 years presenting with AAE were evaluated. Monthly data on CXR utilization encompassing instances where the ordered CXR did not adhere to guidelines was collected before and after implementing interventions. The interventions included provider education, visual reminders, printed cards, grand-round presentations, and electronic medical records modifications. Results: The study encompassed 887 eligible patients with isolated AAE. Baseline data revealed a mean preintervention CXR noncompliance rate of 37.5% among children presenting to the ED with AAE. The interventions resulted in a notable decrease in unnecessary CXR utilization, reaching 16.7%, a reduction sustained throughout subsequent months. Conclusions: This QI project successfully reduced unnecessary CXR utilization in pediatric AAE. A multi-faceted approach involving education, visual aids, and electronic reminders aligned clinical practice with evidence-based guidelines. This QI initiative is a potential template for other healthcare institutions seeking to curtail unnecessary CXR usage in pediatric AAE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.