Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576833›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2024

Isokinetic Testing: Why it is More Important Today than Ever.

Kevin E Wilk, Christopher A Arrigo, George J Davies

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06733116 (Standardizing Reporting Practices for Isokinetic Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06733116 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Standardizing Reporting Practices for Isokinetic Testing: a Delphi Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, CaenRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsDeveloping a Consensus Framework to Standardize Isokinetic Testing Data ReportingArmsDelphi method survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin E Wilk
Christopher A Arrigo
George J Davies

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isokinetics is a proven method to train and objectively assess the capability of muscle groups, particularly at the knee. The current re-injury rates and less than optimal return to sport percentages seen following anterior cruciate ligament surgery highlights the need for greater focus on what tests and methods are used to make these critical decisions. Isokinetics remains the best single method to objectively determine dynamic muscle strength, power, rate of force development and endurance. These factors make it well-suited to play a crucial role in influencing the appropriate patient progression through a rehabilitation program and assisting in determining return to play readiness following injury or surgery. In this article we will discuss why we believe isokinetics is a useful and necessary testing method, and elucidate testing parameters and goals used during knee extension/flexion assessment.

Indexed as

IsokineticsIsokinetic TestingKnee TestingObjective AssessmentReturn to Sport

Identifiers

PMID38576833
PMCPMC10987309
OpenAlexW4393358880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.