ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2024
Use of machine learning models for the prognostication of liver transplantation: A systematic review.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth and development following paediatric kidney transplantation: Mechanisms, influencing factors, and clinical management.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- Does Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Still Matter After Liver Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Survival.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond the Tipping Point: Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and End-Stage Liver Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From myth to machine: artificial intelligence and the future of organ transplantation.BJGP open · 2026Article
- Development and prospective validation of a machine learning model to predict mortality in cirrhosis with esophageal variceal bleeding.World journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Post-Liver Transplantation: A Scoping Review of Comparative Model Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in liver transplantation: current state, future prospects, and challenges - a narrative review.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2026Review
- Explainable Mortality Prediction for Liver Transplant Candidates with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Supervised Clustering Approach.Health data science · 2026Article
- Impact of Diverse Clinical Characteristics on Survival Benefit of Liver Transplantation.Journal of transplantation · 2026Article
- Review
- Gastroenterology in the age of artificial intelligence: Bridging technology and clinical practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Ethics and Algorithms to Navigate AI's Emerging Role in Organ Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mapping artificial intelligence adoption in hepatology practice and research: challenges and opportunities in MENA region.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and comparative evaluation of machine learning models for predicting lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in gastrointestinal cancer patients using multicenter longitudinal clinical data.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Palliative care for end-stage liver disease and acute on chronic liver failure: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2024Article
- Use of Non-Invasive Biomarkers and Clinical Scores to Predict the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: A Bicentric Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Observational
- Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events after orthotopic liver transplantation using a supervised machine learning model: A cohort study.World journal of hepatology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic performance of AI-based models versus physicians among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- The Scottish Hepatology Access Research Partnership (SHARP) improving access to liver services throughout Scotland.NIHR open research · 2024Article
- Machine learning perioperative applications in visceral surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the equitable allocation of scarce donor organs remains a formidable challenge. Prognostic tools are pivotal in identifying the most suitable transplant candidates. Traditionally, scoring systems like the model for end-stage liver disease have been instrumental in this process. Nevertheless, the landscape of prognostication is undergoing a transformation with the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence models.
aimTo assess the utility of ML models in prognostication for LT, comparing their per formance and reliability to established traditional scoring systems.
methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a thorough and standardized literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Our search imposed no restrictions on publication year, age, or gender. Exclusion criteria encompassed non-English stu dies, review articles, case reports, conference papers, studies with missing data, or those exhibiting evident methodological flaws.
resultsOur search yielded a total of 64 articles, with 23 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among the selected studies, 60.8% originated from the United States and China combined. Only one pediatric study met the criteria. Notably, 91% of the studies were published within the past five years. ML models consistently demonstrated satisfactory to excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values (ranging from 0.6 to 1) across all studies, surpassing the performance of traditional scoring systems. Random forest exhibited superior predictive capa bilities for 90-d mortality following LT, sepsis, and acute kidney injury (AKI). In contrast, gradient boosting excelled in predicting the risk of graft-versus-host disease, pneumonia, and AKI.
conclusionThis study underscores the potential of ML models in guiding decisions related to allograft allocation and LT, marking a significant evolution in the field of prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.