Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576659›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparing Perfusion Index and Visual Analogue Scores for Postoperative Pain Assessment Following Upper Limb Surgeries Under Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: An Observational Study.

Pooja Bihani, Akanksha Pandey, Manish Jha, Naveen Paliwal, Rishabh Jaju, Rajendra Solanki

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06535581 (Perfusion Index in the Follow-up of Postoperative Pain; Hypertension Patient Sample), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06535581 completednot on this map

Perfusion Index in the Follow-up of Postoperative Pain; Hypertension Patient Sample

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAmasya UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsPerfusion, ComplicationsArmssurgery patient
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pooja BihaniAnesthesiology, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, IND.
Akanksha PandeyAnesthesiology, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, IND.
Manish JhaAnesthesiology, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, IND.
Naveen PaliwalAnesthesiology, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, IND.
Rishabh JajuAnesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Rajendra SolankiAnesthesiology, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective pain assessment is crucial to tailor the analgesic regimen post-operatively. Perfusion index (PI) has been reported to be a useful objective assessment tool for monitoring pain. This study aimed to explore the utility of PI in assessing postoperative pain in upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular block and its correlation with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores.

methodsThis prospective, observational study included 140 patients scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries. PI, VAS scores, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and physiological parameters were recorded at baseline and postoperatively. Inj. tramadol was administered when the VAS score exceeded ≥ 4 and the VAS score, PI, HR and MAP were recorded at 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after administration. Comparison of normally and non-normally distributed data was done using t-statistics and Mann-Whitney U-test respectively. Pearson correlation was used to establish a correlation between variables and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the cut-off value of PI to determine the onset of pain.

resultsThere was a significant and moderate correlation between pre-analgesic and post-analgesic PI and VAS score (r = -0.425 and -0.448 respectively, p<0.001), while PI and MAP or PI and HR showed only a weak correlation. A cut-off value of 14.7 for PI showed 76.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity in predicting rescue analgesia requirements.

conclusionThe study supports the use of PI as an objective measure for postoperative pain assessment, with a notable correlation with VAS scores. The identified cut-off value for PI adds to its clinical utility in predicting the need for rescue analgesia.

Indexed as

analgesiaobjective measurepainperfusion indexvisual analog scale (vas)

Identifiers

PMID38576659
PMCPMC10993003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.