ReviewCureus2024
Cardiac MRI: An Overview of Physical Principles With Highlights of Clinical Applications and Technological Advancements.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Echo to Coronary Angiography: Optimizing Ischemia Evaluation Through Multimodal Imaging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Myocardial Damage Patterns in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction with and Without Coronary Artery Disease Referred for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to serve as a concise learning tool for clinicians interested in quickly learning more about cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and its physical principles. There is heavy coverage of the basic physical fundamentals of CMR as well as updates on the history, clinical indications, cost-effectiveness, role of artificial intelligence in CMR, and examples of common late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) patterns. This literature review was performed by searching the PubMed database for the most up-to-date literature regarding these topics. Relevant, less up-to-date articles, covering the history and physics of CMR, were also obtained from the PubMed database. Clinical indications for CMR include adult congenital heart disease, cardiac ischemia, cardiomyopathies, and heart failure. CMR has a projected cost-benefit ratio of 0.58, leading to potential savings for patients. Despite its utility, CMR has some drawbacks including long image processing times, large space requirements for equipment, and patient discomfort during imaging. Artificial intelligence-based algorithms can address some of these drawbacks by decreasing image processing times and may have reliable diagnostic capabilities. CMR is quickly rising as a high-resolution, non-invasive cardiac imaging modality with an increasing number of clinical indications. Thanks to technological advancements, especially in artificial intelligence, the benefits of CMR often outweigh its drawbacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.