ArticleCureus2024
Immediate Effect of Simulated High Heels on Pelvic and Spinal Posture in Healthy Young Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Investigations regarding the role of high-heeled shoes in the alteration of the spinopelvic profile attempted to identify a correlation with pain in the lower back. Conclusions from these studies, however, are controversial. In authors knowledge no studies were carried out to investigate the effect of heels on male population, which has been overlooked due to gender-related customs. Research question What is the immediate effect of the height of heels on the sagittal back profile (trunk inclination (TI), pelvic inclination, lordotic lumbar angle (ITL-ILS), kyphotic dorsal angle, lumbar arrow, and cervical arrow) in females and males, not used to wearing high-heeled shoes? Methods One hundred healthy young adult subjects were enrolled. Three were excluded. The remaining 97 subjects (48 female and 49 male) underwent a three-dimensional analysis of the posterior surface of the trunk, using rasterstereography. The spinopelvic profile in the barefoot condition, and with the heel raised by 3 and 7 cm, was recorded. To evaluate the reproducibility of the measure, the neutral evaluation was repeated twice in 23 subjects (13 males, 10 females). Results The change of heel height did not show statistically significant differences for any of the variables used; instead, significant differences were found stratifying the results according to the sex of the subjects tested. Test-retest evaluation in the neutral condition showed no significant differences using the Student's t-test (p > 0.05). Repeatability was excellent and significant for all data used (minimum TI r = 0.85, maximum ITL-ILS r = 0.97). Significance Studying the effect of heels on the spino-pelvic profile also in the male population is crucial for promoting gender-inclusive healthcare, enhancing occupational health practices and developing possible preventive measures. Nevertheless, in the sample of females and males evaluated in this study, the different heights of heel lift did not immediately induce significant changes in pelvis and spine posture. If there is therefore a correlation between low-back pain and the use of heels, it should not reasonably be sought in the immediate change of the spino-pelvic profile caused by raising the heels. However, the variables analyzed differed according to sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.