ArticleHeliyon2024
Differential whole-genome doubling based signatures for improvement on clinical outcomes and drug response in patients with breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct p21 dynamics drive alternative routes to whole-genome duplication through a common CDK4/6-dependent polyploid G0 state.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genome doubling as a dynamic driver of ovarian cancer evolution: insights from single-cell sequencing.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole genome doublings (WGD), a hallmark of human cancer, is pervasive in breast cancer patients. However, the molecular mechanism of the complete impact of WGD on survival and treatment response in breast cancer remains unclear. To address this, we performed a comprehensive and systematic analysis of WGD, aiming to identify distinct genetic alterations linked to WGD and highlight its improvement on clinical outcomes and treatment response for breast cancer. A linear regression model along with weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was applied on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset to identify critical genes related to WGD. Further Cox regression models with random selection were used to optimize the most useful prognostic markers in the TCGA dataset. The clinical implication of the risk model was further assessed through prognostic impact evaluation, tumor stratification, functional analysis, genomic feature difference analysis, drug response analysis, and multiple independent datasets for validation. Our findings revealed a high aneuploidy burden, chromosomal instability (CIN), copy number variation (CNV), and mutation burden in breast tumors exhibiting WGD events. Moreover, 247 key genes associated with WGD were identified from the distinct genomic patterns in the TCGA dataset. A risk model consisting of 22 genes was optimized from the key genes. High-risk breast cancer patients were more prone to WGD and exhibited greater genomic diversity compared to low-risk patients. Some oncogenic signaling pathways were enriched in the high-risk group, while primary immune deficiency pathways were enriched in the low-risk group. We also identified a risk gene, ANLN (anillin), which displayed a strong positive correlation with two crucial WGD genes, KIF18A and CCNE2. Tumors with high expression of ANLN were more prone to WGD events and displayed worse clinical survival outcomes. Furthermore, the expression levels of these risk genes were significantly associated with the sensitivities of BRCA cell lines to multiple drugs, providing valuable insights for targeted therapies. These findings will be helpful for further improvement on clinical outcomes and contribution to drug development in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.