Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576543›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2024

Robotic low anterior resection with complete splenic flexure mobilization and defunctioning left-sided loop colostomy: a case series.

Martin Rutegård, Anders Gerdin, Jannice Forssell, Olle Sjöström, Andreas Söderström, Petrus Vinnars

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin RutegårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-6373
Anders GerdinDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
Jannice ForssellDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
Olle SjöströmDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 85, Sweden.
Andreas SöderströmDepartment of Surgery, Sunderby Hospital, SE-971 80, Luleå, Sweden.
Petrus VinnarsDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SESunderby sjukhus · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A defunctioning stoma is used to alleviate the consequences of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A loop ileostomy is often preferred but may lead to dehydration and kidney injury. Here, we present a case series for an alternative: the left-sided loop colostomy. A convenience sample of four patients underwent robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. A complete splenic flexure mobilization and a total mesorectal excision were performed. To defunction the anastomosis, the redundant left colon was brought up to a stoma site in the left iliac fossa and matured as a loop colostomy. Two patients experienced minor stoma leaks and one also had a small prolapse, while all patients had their colostomies reversed on average 7 months after surgery without complications. There were no dehydration episodes and creatinine levels remained within baseline levels at end of follow-up (on average 18 months).

Indexed as

anastomotic leakagedefunctioning stomaloop stomatotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID38576543
PMCPMC10993289
OpenAlexW4390744858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.