Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576534›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2024

Structural neuroimaging markers of normal pressure hydrocephalus versus Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in chronic TBI-a narrative review.

Sharada Kadaba Sridhar, Jen Dysterheft Robb, Rishabh Gupta, Scarlett Cheong, Rui Kuang, Uzma Samadani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in genetics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharada Kadaba SridharDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jen Dysterheft RobbNeurotrauma Research Lab, Center for Veterans Research and Education, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rishabh GuptaNeurotrauma Research Lab, Center for Veterans Research and Education, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Scarlett CheongDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rui KuangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Uzma SamadaniDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) is a prominent type of reversible dementia that may be treated with shunt surgery, and it is crucial to differentiate it from irreversible degeneration caused by its symptomatic mimics like Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). Similarly, it is important to distinguish between (normal pressure) hydrocephalus and irreversible atrophy/degeneration which are among the chronic effects of Traumatic Brain Injury (cTBI), as the former may be reversed through shunt placement. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the structural imaging markers which may be foundational to the development of accurate, noninvasive, and accessible solutions to this problem. Methods: By searching the PubMed database for keywords related to NPH, AD, PD, and cTBI, we reviewed studies that examined the (1) distinct neuroanatomical markers of degeneration in NPH versus AD and PD, and atrophy versus hydrocephalus in cTBI and (2) computational methods for their (semi-) automatic assessment on Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. Results: Structural markers of NPH and those that can distinguish it from AD have been well studied, but only a few studies have explored its structural distinction between PD. The structural implications of cTBI over time have been studied. But neuroanatomical markers that can predict shunt response in patients with either symptomatic idiopathic NPH or post-traumatic hydrocephalus have not been reliably established. MRI-based markers dominate this field of investigation as compared to CT, which is also reflected in the disproportionate number of MRI-based computational methods for their automatic assessment. Conclusion: Along with an up-to-date literature review on the structural neurodegeneration due to NPH versus AD/PD, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in cTBI, this article sheds light on the potential of structural imaging markers as (differential) diagnostic aids for the timely recognition of patients with reversible (normal pressure) hydrocephalus, and opportunities to develop computational tools for their objective assessment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s dementiachronic traumatic brain injurycomputational methodsnormal pressure hydrocephalusParkinson’s diseasestructural imaging

Identifiers

PMID38576534
PMCPMC10991762
OpenAlexW4393022685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.