ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly type 2 associated with a novel
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the genetic spectrum of autosomal recessive microcephaly in Pakistani families.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Role of non-coding RNAs in OOncology letters · 2026Review
- Whole-exome sequencing reveals a novel variant in two Iranian families with autosomal recessive primary microcephaly.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized primarily by congenital microcephaly and intellectual disability but without extra-central nervous system malformations. This investigation aimed to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of microcephaly in a patient from a Chinese consanguineous family. Methods: A comprehensive clinical assessment, including brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalogram (EEG), and genetic analyses, was conducted to evaluate the patient's condition. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was employed to identify the causative gene, followed by Sanger sequencing, to confirm the mutation and its segregation within the family. Reverse transcript polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was utilized to detect changes in splicing. Western blot was employed to reveal the difference of protein expression level between the wild-type and mutant WDR62 in vitro. Results: The patient exhibited classic MCPH symptoms, including microcephaly, recurrent epilepsy, delayed psychomotor development, and intellectual disability. Additionally, asymmetrical limb length was noted as a prominent feature. MRI findings indicated reduced brain volume with cortical malformations, while EEG demonstrated heightened sharp wave activity. A molecular analysis uncovered a novel homozygous variant c.4154-6 C > G in the Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of the genetic heterogeneity associated with MCPH and highlights the pivotal role of genetic testing in the diagnosing and managing of rare neurodevelopmental disorders. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of emerging genetic therapies in treating conditions such as MCPH2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.