ArticleKidney medicine2024
Selective Cytopheretic Device Use in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Children: A Cohort Study With a Historical Comparator.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Extracorporeal Organ Support Therapies for Acute Kidney Injury in Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pediatric sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: leveraging pathophysiology for risk stratification and identification of treatable traits.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Novel extracorporeal therapies in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Early post-approval experience of the selective cytopheretic device surveillance registry for pediatric AKI requiring kidney replacement therapy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Observational
- Observational
- Extracorporeal therapies in sepsis: a comprehensive review of the Selective Cytopheretic Device, Polymyxin B and Seraph cartridges.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Selective Cytopheretic Device Therapy in the Context of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Article
- Selective Cytopheretic Device (QUELimmune): A Leukocyte Processing, Immunomodulatory Device.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Navigating the Precipice: continuous renal replacement therapy in critically Ill children with oncologic diseases.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and Objective: Critically ill children with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are at increased risk of death. The selective cytopheretic device (SCD) promotes an immunomodulatory effect at circuit-ionized calcium of <0.40 mmol/L. In an adult CRRT patient study, SCD-treated patients reported improved survival or dialysis independence. We reported safety data from children who received CRRT-SCD therapy and compared outcomes with a historic pediatric CRRT cohort. Study Design: We performed 2 prospective multicenter studies to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SCD in critically ill children. Setting and Participants: Four pediatric institutions enrolled children weighing 10 kg or more with AKI and multi-organ dysfunction receiving CRRT as the standard of care with the SCD-integrated post-CRRT membrane. Exposure: Patients received CRRT-SCD with regional citrate anticoagulation for up to 7-10 days, or CRRT discontinuation, whichever came first. Analytical Approach: We reported serious adverse events among patients and CRRT-SCD-related process and outcome variables. We compared survival to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge rates between the CRRT-SCD cohort and a matched cohort from the prospective pediatric CRRT registry, using odds ratios in multivariable analysis for factors associated with prospective pediatric CRRT patient ICU mortality. To validate these crude analyses, Bayesian logistic regression was performed to assess for attributable benefit-risk assessment of the SCD. Results: Twenty-two patients received CRRT-SCD treatments. Fifteen serious adverse events were recorded; none were SCD-related. Seventeen patients survived till ICU discharge or day 60. Both multivariable and Bayesian analyses revealed a probable benefit of the addition of SCD. Fourteen of the 16 patients surviving ICU discharge reported a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and no patient was dialysis dependent at 60 days. Limitations: The study had a few limitations, such as (1) a small sample size in the SCD-PED cohort group; (2) unchanging historic control group; and (3) adverse events were not recorded in the control group. Conclusions: The SCD therapy is feasible, safe, and demonstrates probable benefit for critically ill children who require CRRT for AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.