Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576525›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2024

Selective Cytopheretic Device Use in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Children: A Cohort Study With a Historical Comparator.

Stuart L Goldstein, Nicholas J Ollberding, David J Askenazi, Rajit K Basu, David T Selewski, Kelli A Krallman, Lenar Yessayan, Harvey David Humes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Novel extracorporeal therapies in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart L GoldsteinDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Nicholas J OllberdingDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
David J AskenaziDivision of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Rajit K BasuDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
David T SelewskiDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Kelli A KrallmanDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lenar YessayanDivision of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Harvey David HumesDivision of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USLurie Children's Hospital · USMedical University of South Carolina · USSt. Vincent's Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale and Objective: Critically ill children with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are at increased risk of death. The selective cytopheretic device (SCD) promotes an immunomodulatory effect at circuit-ionized calcium of <0.40 mmol/L. In an adult CRRT patient study, SCD-treated patients reported improved survival or dialysis independence. We reported safety data from children who received CRRT-SCD therapy and compared outcomes with a historic pediatric CRRT cohort. Study Design: We performed 2 prospective multicenter studies to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SCD in critically ill children. Setting and Participants: Four pediatric institutions enrolled children weighing 10 kg or more with AKI and multi-organ dysfunction receiving CRRT as the standard of care with the SCD-integrated post-CRRT membrane. Exposure: Patients received CRRT-SCD with regional citrate anticoagulation for up to 7-10 days, or CRRT discontinuation, whichever came first. Analytical Approach: We reported serious adverse events among patients and CRRT-SCD-related process and outcome variables. We compared survival to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge rates between the CRRT-SCD cohort and a matched cohort from the prospective pediatric CRRT registry, using odds ratios in multivariable analysis for factors associated with prospective pediatric CRRT patient ICU mortality. To validate these crude analyses, Bayesian logistic regression was performed to assess for attributable benefit-risk assessment of the SCD. Results: Twenty-two patients received CRRT-SCD treatments. Fifteen serious adverse events were recorded; none were SCD-related. Seventeen patients survived till ICU discharge or day 60. Both multivariable and Bayesian analyses revealed a probable benefit of the addition of SCD. Fourteen of the 16 patients surviving ICU discharge reported a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and no patient was dialysis dependent at 60 days. Limitations: The study had a few limitations, such as (1) a small sample size in the SCD-PED cohort group; (2) unchanging historic control group; and (3) adverse events were not recorded in the control group. Conclusions: The SCD therapy is feasible, safe, and demonstrates probable benefit for critically ill children who require CRRT for AKI.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injurychildrencontinuous renal replacement therapysafetyselective cytopheretic devicesurvival

Identifiers

PMID38576525
PMCPMC10990749
OpenAlexW4391849357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.