ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Optimization system for training efficiency and load balance based on the fusion of heart rate and inertial sensors.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and wearable sensors in sports injury risk prediction: current status and future perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Wearable Biosensing and Machine Learning for Data-Driven Training and Coaching Support.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Multimodal human action recognition and personalized sports health promotion: a deep learning framework integrating wearable sensor fusion.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
- Time Series Analysis of Muscle Deformation During Physiotherapy Using Optical Wearable Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To enhance the daily training quality of athletes without inducing significant physiological fatigue, aiming to achieve a balance between training efficiency and load. Design methods: Firstly, we developed an activity classification training model using the random forest algorithm and introduced the "effective training rate" (the ratio of effective activity time to total time) as a metric for assessing athlete training efficiency. Secondly, a method for rating athlete training load was established, involving qualitative and quantitative analyses of physiological fatigue through subjective fatigue scores and heart rate data. Lastly, an optimization system for training efficiency and load balance, utilizing multiple inertial sensors, was created. Athlete states were categorized into nine types based on the training load and efficiency ratings, with corresponding management recommendations provided. Results: Overall, this study, combining a sports activity recognition model with a physiological fatigue assessment model, has developed a training efficiency and load balance optimization system with excellent performance. The results indicate that the prediction accuracy of the sports activity recognition model is as high as 94.70%. Additionally, the physiological fatigue assessment model, utilizing average relative heart rate and average RPE score as evaluation metrics, demonstrates a good overall fit, validating the feasibility of this model. Conclusions: This study, based on relative heart rate and wearable devices to monitor athlete physiological fatigue, has developed a balanced optimization system for training efficiency and load. It provides a reference for athletes' physical health and fatigue levels, offering corresponding management recommendations for coaches and relevant professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.