Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576348›Full record

ArticleWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2024

Open-loop recycling of end-of-life textiles as geopolymer fibre reinforcement.

Mária Ambrus, Gábor Mucsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mária AmbrusInstitute of Raw Material Preparation and Environmental Process Engineering, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7171-6642
Gábor MucsiInstitute of Raw Material Preparation and Environmental Process Engineering, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment and management of textile waste is an ever-growing issue worldwide, due to the continuously changing trends and the popularity of fast-fashion brands. There are numerous waste management methods besides simple landfilling, including reuse, open-loop or closed-loop recycling options. The described research explores the applicability of an open-loop recycling method, the processing of end-of-life textiles to produce fibres for fibre-reinforced geopolymers, to combine various waste streams for the production of an environmentally friendly binder system. By the examination of different textile waste processing methods, the most valuable fibrous material was produced with the application of a rotary shear and a vertical cutting mill, eliminating the necessity of manual cutting. As the most common base material of the textiles was found to be polyester and cotton, these were deemed useful for fibre reinforcement. The flexural strength showed a significant increase with the addition of 5 wt.% fibres, indicating the possibility of more than doubling the flexural strength of geopolymer specimens. Based on the microstructural analysis, however, even though there was good adhesion between the fibre and the geopolymer matrix, the latter showed inhomogeneities with higher fibre addition, indicating the need to further optimise the production steps, such as mixing time, vibration time, etc.

Indexed as

RecyclingTextilesPolyestersPolymersWaste ManagementPolyestersPolymersComminutionfibre productiongeopolymerisationmechanical propertiesrecyclingtextile waste

Identifiers

PMID38576348
PMCPMC11373156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.