Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576244›Full record

ReviewAnnals of dermatology2024

A Comprehensive Review of the Acne Grading Scale in 2023.

In Ho Bae, Jun Ho Kwak, Chan Ho Na, Min Sung Kim, Bong Seok Shin, Hoon Choi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07473895 (Efficacy and Safety of Topical 5% Spironolactone Gel Nano-Formulation Versus 0.1% Adapalene Gel in the Management of Acne Vulgaris), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07473895 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Topical 5% Spironolactone Gel Nano-Formulation Versus 0.1% Adapalene Gel in the Management of Acne Vulgaris: A Split-Face Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsAcne VulgarisArmsSpironolactone 5% Topical Gel, Adapalene 0.1% Topical Gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

In Ho BaeDepartment of Dermatology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9166-4050
Jun Ho KwakDepartment of Dermatology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-7986
Chan Ho NaDepartment of Dermatology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5259-5382
Min Sung KimDepartment of Dermatology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-6653
Bong Seok ShinDepartment of Dermatology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-1763
Hoon ChoiDepartment of Dermatology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea. choihoon@chosun.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-3550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acne is a common skin inflammatory condition that can significantly affect the patient's quality of life. Therefore, accurate assessment scales are very important for treatment and management of acne vulgaris. This review article issues a comprehensive review of various acne severity assessment scales. In this text, the authors review the acne grading scales, such as the Pillsbury scale, Cook's acne grading scale, Leeds acne grading system, Global Acne Grading System, and investigator's global assessment, etc. And we delve into the characteristics, advantages, limitations, and applicability of these scales. The acne grading scale to be developed in the future should be objective, accurate, comprehensive, easy to use, and applicable in a variety of clinics and research settings. Current technologies, such as artificial intelligence, could potentially contribute to the development of ideal acne grading scales that meet unmet needs.

Indexed as

AcneAssessmentGradingScaleSeverity

Identifiers

PMID38576244
PMCPMC10995619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.