Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38576187›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2024

Detection and Grading of Radiographic Hand Osteoarthritis Using an Automated Machine Learning Platform.

Leo Caratsch, Christian Lechtenboehmer, Matteo Caorsi, Karine Oung, Fabio Zanchi, Yasser Aleman, Ulrich A Walker, Patrick Omoumi, Thomas Hügle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Leo CaratschLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christian LechtenboehmerLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-3287
Matteo CaorsiL2F (Learn to Forecast), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Karine OungLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fabio ZanchiLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yasser AlemanLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ulrich A WalkerUniversity Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Patrick OmoumiLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas HügleLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-9581
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAutomated machine learning (autoML) platforms allow health care professionals to play an active role in the development of machine learning (ML) algorithms according to scientific or clinical needs. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate such a model for automated detection and grading of distal hand osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsA total of 13,690 hand radiographs from 2,863 patients within the Swiss Cohort of Quality Management (SCQM) and an external control data set of 346 non-SCQM patients were collected and scored for distal interphalangeal OA (DIP-OA) using the modified Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) score. Giotto (Learn to Forecast [L2F]) was used as an autoML platform for training two convolutional neural networks for DIP joint extraction and subsequent classification according to the K/L scores. A total of 48,892 DIP joints were extracted and then used to train the classification model. Heatmaps were generated independently of the platform. User experience of a web application as a provisional user interface was investigated by rheumatologists and radiologists.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of this model for detecting DIP-OA were 79% and 86%, respectively. The accuracy for grading the correct K/L score was 75%, with a κ score of 0.76. The accuracy per DIP-OA class differed, with 86% for no OA (defined as K/L scores 0 and 1), 71% for a K/L score of 2, 46% for a K/L score of 3, and 67% for a K/L score of 4. Similar values were obtained in an independent external test set. Qualitative and quantitative user experience testing of the web application revealed a moderate to high demand for automated DIP-OA scoring among rheumatologists. Conversely, radiologists expressed a low demand, except for the use of heatmaps.

conclusionAutoML platforms are an opportunity to develop clinical end-to-end ML algorithms. Here, automated radiographic DIP-OA detection is both feasible and usable, whereas grading among individual K/L scores (eg, for clinical trials) remains challenging.

Identifiers

PMID38576187
PMCPMC11168904
OpenAlexW4393987936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.