ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2024
Validation of the Reichert® Tono-Vera® Vet rebound tonometer in normal ex vivo canine eyes.
Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial assessment of a species-specific rebound measurement mode for non-human primates.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Comparison of three rebound tonometers in rabbits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Validation of the EYEMATE-SC Suprachoroidal Pressure Transducer for Telemetric Measurement of Intraocular Pressure in Normal Ex Vivo Canine and Equine Globes-Preliminary Results.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of measurement performance among Tono-Vera vet, Tono-Pen vet, and Tono-Vet plus using an ex vivo porcine eye model.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- An assessment of bacterial transmission via rebound tonometry: AnOpen veterinary journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the accuracy of the Reichert® Tono-Vera® Vet rebound tonometer for canine intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. ANIMALS STUDIED: Five normal canine ex vivo globes. PROCEDURES: The anterior chambers of five freshly enucleated normal canine eyes were cannulated and connected to a reservoir of Plasma-Lyte A and a manometer. Starting at a manometric IOP of 5 mmHg, the pressure was progressively increased to 80 mmHg by raising the reservoir. Triplicate IOP measurements were taken with the Tono-Vera® Vet from the central cornea using the dog setting and compared to the manometric pressure by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsThere was a strong positive linear regression trend when comparing central corneal Tono-Vera® Vet IOPs to manometric pressures (r
conclusionsMeasurement of IOPs from the central cornea with the Tono-Vera® Vet provided accurate results over a large range in normal canine globes compared to direct manometry. The mild to moderate underestimation of IOPs at high pressures was not considered clinically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.