Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575936›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Genome-wide association study and development of molecular markers for yield and quality traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).

Minjie Guo, Li Deng, Jianzhong Gu, Jianli Miao, Junhua Yin, Yang Li, Yuanjin Fang, Bingyan Huang, Ziqi Sun, Feiyan Qi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Research Progress on High-Protein Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimizing Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Minjie Guo *Peanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Li Deng *Peanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Jianzhong Gu *Peanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Jianli MiaoPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Junhua YinPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Yang LiPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Yuanjin FangShennong Laboratory, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Bingyan HuangShennong Laboratory, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Ziqi SunShennong Laboratory, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Feiyan QiShennong Laboratory, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Wenzhao DongShennong Laboratory, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Zhenhua LuPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Shaowei LiPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Junping HuPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Xinyou ZhangShennong Laboratory, Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Improvement, Henan Academy of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. haasxinyou@163.com.
Li RenPeanut Institute, Kaifeng Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Kaifeng, 475004, China. renli120@sina.com.

Funding

Agricultural Project for Variety Improvement of Henna Province 20220100001Agriculture Research System of China CARS-13Key Research and Development Project of Kaifeng 19ZD004Major Science and Technology Project of Henan Province 221100110300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to decipher the genetic basis governing yield components and quality attributes of peanuts, a critical aspect for advancing molecular breeding techniques. Integrating genotype re-sequencing and phenotypic evaluations of seven yield components and two grain quality traits across four distinct environments allowed for the execution of a genome-wide association study (GWAS).

resultsThe nine phenotypic traits were all continuous and followed a normal distribution. The broad heritability ranged from 88.09 to 98.08%, and the genotype-environment interaction effects were all significant. There was a highly significant negative correlation between protein content (PC) and oil content (OC). The 10× genome re-sequencing of 199 peanut accessions yielded a total of 631,988 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), with 374 significant SNP loci identified in association with the nine traits of interest. Notably, 66 of these pertinent SNPs were detected in multiple environments, and 48 of them were linked to multiple traits of interest. Five loci situated on chromosome 16 (Chr16) exhibited pleiotropic effects on yield traits, accounting for 17.64-32.61% of the observed phenotypic variation. Two loci on Chr08 were found to be strongly associated with protein and oil contents, accounting for 12.86% and 14.06% of their respective phenotypic variations, respectively. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) block analysis of these seven loci unraveled five nonsynonymous variants, leading to the identification of one yield-related candidate gene and two quality-related candidate genes. The correlation between phenotypic variation and SNP loci in these candidate genes was validated by Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) marker analysis.

conclusionsOverall, molecular markers were developed for genetic loci associated with yield and quality traits through a GWAS investigation of 199 peanut accessions across four distinct environments. These molecular tools can aid in the development of desirable peanut germplasm with an equilibrium of yield and quality through marker-assisted breeding.

Indexed as

ArachisGenome-Wide Association StudyChromosome MappingPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenome-wide association study (GWAS)Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) markerPeanutQuality traitsRe-sequencingYield traits

Identifiers

PMID38575936
PMCPMC10996145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.