Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575914›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Assessment of dental students' knowledge and performance of master gutta-percha cone selection and fitting during root canal treatment: a pilot study.

Sarah M Alkahtany, Shaima E Alabdulkareem, Wajd H Alharbi, Norah F Alrebdi, Tomather Sultan Askar, Sundus M Bukhary, Amal A Almohaimede, Kholod Khalil Al-Manei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah M AlkahtanyDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia. Salkahtany@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4448-9146
Shaima E AlabdulkareemGeneral Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
Wajd H AlharbiGeneral Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
Norah F AlrebdiGeneral Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
Tomather Sultan AskarGeneral Dentist, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
Sundus M BukharyDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
Amal A AlmohaimedeDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
Kholod Khalil Al-ManeiDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, 11527, Riyadh, PO Box 68004, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMisconceptions should be detected early in dental students' training to improve their clinical performance. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess undergraduate dental students' knowledge and performance of master gutta-percha (GP) cone selection and fitting during clinical endodontic courses at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University.

methodsNinety-nine undergraduate dental students completed an online survey about their knowledge of master GP cone selection. Forty-five of these students were observed by faculty members in clinical endodontic courses while they fitted master GP cones during root canal treatments. The observers recorded the details of each student's cone-fitting techniques. The data were analysed using t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and chi-square tests (p < 0.05). Inter- and intra-observer reliability were tested using Fliess' Kappa. RESULTS SURVEY: All participants had good knowledge of over-extended cone management, while 80.8% knew how to properly manage a short cone. The proper flaring assessment method was selected by 86.9% of the female and 34.2% of the male students, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). OBSERVATION: The students labelled the working length on the master GP cone with an indentation in 64.4% of the cases and by bending the cone 35.6% of the time. Of all students, 84.4% encountered an apical stop, and this rate correlated significantly with the length of the cone on the master apical cone radiograph (p = 0.001). Improper shaping of the canal was the most common cause of ill-fitting cones (83.3%), while 16.7% of the students chose the wrong cone size. The final obturation length was adequate in 80% of the cases; 57.8% of the students were helped by instructors.

conclusionsMost students had the basic knowledge required to solve problems related to the selection of master GP cones. However, in the clinical setting, more than half of the students required the assistance of an instructor to adjust their cone's fit. The presence of an apical stop had the most significant effect on the length of the fitted master GP cone on radiography. The most common cause of ill-fitting master cones was improper shaping of the canal.

Indexed as

Gutta-PerchaRoot Canal Filling MaterialsDental Pulp CavityFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsRoot Canal ObturationStudents, DentalGutta-PerchaRoot Canal Filling MaterialsDental educationDental studentEndodonticsGutta-perchaMaster coneObturation

Identifiers

PMID38575914
PMCPMC10996191
OpenAlexW4393932222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.