Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575823›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Predicting ischemic stroke patients' prognosis changes using machine learning in a nationwide stroke registry.

Ching-Heng Lin, Yi-An Chen, Jiann-Shing Jeng, Yu Sun, Cheng-Yu Wei, Po-Yen Yeh, Wei-Lun Chang, Yang C Fann, Kai-Cheng Hsu, Jiunn-Tay Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ching-Heng LinDivision of Intramural Research, Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Neurological, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Yi-An ChenCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jiann-Shing JengStroke Center and Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu SunDepartment of Neurology, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yu WeiDepartment of Exercise and Health Promotion, College of Kinesiology and Health, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Yen YehDepartment of Neurology, St. Martin de Porres Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Wei-Lun ChangDepartment of Neurology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua County, Taiwan.
Yang C FannDivision of Intramural Research, Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Neurological, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. fann@ninds.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-2002
Kai-Cheng HsuDepartment of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. edwardfirst@gmail.com.
Jiunn-Tay LeeDepartment of Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Taiwan Stroke Registry Investigators

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CGRPG3L0011China Medical University Hospital DMR-111-105Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 110-2222-E-182A-001-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients after discharge is crucial for physicians to plan for long-term health care. Although previous studies have demonstrated that machine learning (ML) shows reasonably accurate stroke outcome predictions with limited datasets, to identify specific clinical features associated with prognosis changes after stroke that could aid physicians and patients in devising improved recovery care plans have been challenging. This study aimed to overcome these gaps by utilizing a large national stroke registry database to assess various prediction models that estimate how patients' prognosis changes over time with associated clinical factors. To properly evaluate the best predictive approaches currently available and avoid prejudice, this study employed three different prognosis prediction models including a statistical logistic regression model, commonly used clinical-based scores, and a latest high-performance ML-based XGBoost model. The study revealed that the XGBoost model outperformed other two traditional models, achieving an AUROC of 0.929 in predicting the prognosis changes of stroke patients followed for 3 months. In addition, the XGBoost model maintained remarkably high precision even when using only selected 20 most relevant clinical features compared to full clinical datasets used in the study. These selected features closely correlated with significant changes in clinical outcomes for stroke patients and showed to be effective for predicting prognosis changes after discharge, allowing physicians to make optimal decisions regarding their patients' recovery.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeMachine LearningRegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisStrokeIschemic strokeMachine learningNation-wide registry databasePrognosis changesRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38575823
PMCPMC11289005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.