Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575809›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[(Uro)genital developmental disorders].

Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans-Joachim MentzelSektion Kinderradiologie, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena. Am Klinikum 1., 07747, Jena, Deutschland. Hans-Joachim.Mentzel@med.uni-jena.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueCongenital anomalies of the urogenital tract are common, whereas isolated developmental disorders of the genital organs are rare and varied. The type and timing of imaging to characterize these developmental disorders and the planning of any treatment are the subject of discussion. The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of embryology, diagnostic procedures, and examples of findings. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsThe primary procedure for imaging the genitals is sonography, which must be performed with appropriate empathy. In addition to the genitals, the general situation of the kidneys and urinary tract should be examined, as urogenital malformations are often combined. Dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated as advanced imaging in interdisciplinary consultations. Invasive procedures, such as genitography combined with micturition cystourethrography (MCU) using X‑rays or contrast-enhanced sonography, are rarely required. Computed tomography (CT) or excretory urography play no role.

conclusionImaging plays an important role in the assessment of genital anomalies. Knowledge of embryology facilitates anatomical understanding and the assessment of pathologies.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingUrogenital AbnormalitiesChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleUltrasonographyComplex urogenital malformationsContrast-enhanced voiding urosonographyGenital malformationsGenitographyVoiding cystourethrography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.