Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575775›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

OpenWMB: An open-source and automated working memory task battery for OpenSesame.

Fábio Monteiro, Letícia Botan Nascimento, José Leitão, Eduardo J R Santos, Paulo Rodrigues, Isabel M Santos, Fátima Simões, Carla S Nascimento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fábio MonteiroCINEICC - Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. uc2021194081@student.uc.pt.
Letícia Botan NascimentoDepartment of Psychology and Education, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
José LeitãoCINEICC - Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Eduardo J R SantosFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Paulo RodriguesDepartment of Psychology and Education, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Isabel M SantosWilliam James Center for Research, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Fátima SimõesDepartment of Psychology and Education, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Carla S NascimentoDepartment of Psychology and Education, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory capacity (WMC) has been measured with a plethora of cognitive tasks. Several preeminent automated batteries of working memory (WM) tasks have been developed recently. However, despite all their advantages, most batteries were programmed in paid platforms and/or only included a single WM paradigm. To address these issues, we developed the OpenWMB, an automated battery comprising seven tasks from three distinct paradigms (complex spans, updating tasks, and binding tasks) that tap into several functional aspects of WM (simultaneous storage and processing, updating, and binding). The battery runs on open-source software (OpenSesame) and is freely available online in a ready-to-download format. The OpenWMB possesses flexible features and includes a data processing script (that converts data into a format ready for statistical analysis). The instrument is available in Portuguese and English. However, we only assessed the psychometric properties of the former version. The Portuguese version presented good internal consistency and considerable internal and predictive validity: all tasks loaded into a single factor. Additionally, the WMC estimate was strongly correlated with a fluid intelligence factor. This study also tried to contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the best method to assess WMC. We computed a permutation analysis to compare the amount of variance shared between a fluid intelligence factor and (1) each WM task, (2) homogenous WMC factors (based on multiple tasks from the same paradigm), and (3) heterogeneous WMC factors (derived from triplets of tasks from different paradigms). Our results suggested that heterogeneous factors provided the best estimates of WMC.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermSoftwareAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIntelligenceMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultComputerised cognitive assessmentMethodologyOpenSesamePsychometryWorking memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID38575775
PMCPMC11362385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.