ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Pallidal deep brain stimulation for patients with myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- From SGCE gene to symptoms: decoding myoclonus-dystonia.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Review
- Long-Term Efficacy of Bilateral Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation in Myoclonus-Dystonia Associated with KCNN2 Gene Mutation: A Case Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPallidal deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) is effective for treating myoclonus and dystonia caused by SGCE mutations (DYT-SGCE, DYT11). However, it is unknown whether GPi-DBS is effective for the treatment of myoclonus-dystonia which is not associated with the SGCE gene mutations. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of GPi-DBS in treating myoclonus-dystonia in SGCE mutation-negative cases.
methodsThree patients with myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations who underwent GPi-DBS were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using the Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS) and Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (FMDRS) for myoclonus and dystonia, respectively. In two of the three patients, myoclonus was more evident during action. Myoclonus was predominant at rest in the other patient, and he was unaware of his dystonia symptoms. The results were compared with those of the four DYT-SGCE cases.
resultsThe mean UMRS score in patients with myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations improved from 61.7 to 33.7 pre- and postoperatively, respectively, and the mean FMDRS score improved from 7.2 to 4.5. However, the degree of improvement in myoclonus-dystonia in patients without SGCE mutations was inferior to that in patients with DYT-SGCE (the UMRS score improved by 45% and 69%, respectively).
conclusionsGPi-DBS is effective for treating myoclonus-dystonia in patients with and without SGCE mutations. GPi-DBS should be considered as a treatment option for myoclonus-dystonia without SGCE mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.