Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38575721›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Integrating mangrove growth and failure in coastal flood protection designs.

A Gijón Mancheño, V Vuik, B K van Wesenbeeck, S N Jonkman, R van Hespen, J R Moll, S Kazi, I Urrutia, M van Ledden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mangrove restoration and coastal flood adaptation: A global perspective on the potential for hybrid coastal defenses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A Gijón MancheñoDelft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, 2628 CN, The Netherlands. a.gijonmancheno-1@tudelft.nl.
V VuikHKV Consultants, P.O. Box 2120, Lelystad, 8203 AC, The Netherlands.
B K van WesenbeeckDepartment of Ecosystems and Sediment Dynamics, Deltares, P.O. Box 177, Delft, 2600 MH, The Netherlands.
S N JonkmanDelft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, 2628 CN, The Netherlands.
R van HespenDepartment of Estuarine and Delta Systems, WNIOZ Yerseke, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
J R MollDelft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, 2628 CN, The Netherlands.
S KaziWorld Bank, 1818 H Street, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
I UrrutiaWorld Bank, 1818 H Street, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
M van LeddenWorld Bank, 1818 H Street, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
Delft University of Technology · NLWorld Bank · USDeltares · NLRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research · NL

Funding

GFDRR 7204185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mangrove forests reduce wave attack along tropical and sub-tropical coastlines, decreasing the wave loads acting on coastal protection structures. Mangrove belts seaward of embankments can therefore lower their required height and decrease their slope protection thickness. Wave reduction by mangroves depends on tree frontal surface area and stability against storms, but both aspects are often oversimplified or neglected in coastal protection designs. Here we present a framework to evaluate how mangrove belts influence embankment designs, including mangrove growth over time and failure by overturning and trunk breakage. This methodology is applied to Sonneratia apetala mangroves seaward of embankments in Bangladesh, considering forest widths between 10 and 1000 m (cross-shore). For water depths of 5 m, wave reduction by mangrove forests narrower than 1 km mostly affects the slope protection and the bank erodibility, whereas the required embankment height is less influenced by mangroves. Sonneratia apetala trees experience a relative maximum in wave attenuation capacity at 10 years age, due to their large submerged canopy area. Once trees are more than 20 years old, their canopy is emergent, and most wave attenuation is caused by trunk and roots. Canopy emergence exposes mangroves to wind loads, which are much larger than wave loads, and can cause tree failure during cyclones. These results stress the importance of including tree surface area and stability models when predicting coastal protection by mangroves.

Identifiers

PMID38575721
PMCPMC10995189
OpenAlexW4393932154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.