ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2024
Non-symmetric stapling of native peptides.
Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unified Access to Biaryl-Bridged Linkages Unlocks Structural Diversification of Noncanonical Cyclic Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- α-Helical peptides: design strategies and recent advances in biomedical applications.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Isolable Cysteine Sulfenyl Iodide: Stabilization by a Molecular Cradle, Crystal Structure, and Biologically Relevant Reactivity.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025Article
- Cys-Lys stapling for unprotected peptides via tunable linkers.National science review · 2025Article
- Peptide/Protein Functionalization and Macrocyclization via Alkyne Umpolung with Hypervalent Iodine Reagents.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Article
- Chemoselective, regioselective, and positionally selective fluorogenic stapling of unprotected peptides for cellular uptake and direct cell imaging.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Tackling Undruggable Targets with Designer Peptidomimetics and Synthetic Biologics.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stapling has emerged as a powerful technique in peptide chemistry. It enables precise control over peptide conformation leading to enhanced properties such as improved stability and enhanced binding affinity. Although symmetric stapling methods have been extensively explored, the field of non-symmetric stapling of native peptides has received less attention, largely as a result of the formidable challenges it poses - in particular the complexities involved in achieving the high chemo-selectivity and site-selectivity required to simultaneously modify distinct proteinogenic residues. Over the past 5 years, there have been significant breakthroughs in addressing these challenges. In this Review, we describe the latest strategies for non-symmetric stapling of native peptides, elucidating the protocols, reaction mechanisms and underlying design principles. We also discuss current challenges and opportunities this field offers for future applications, such as ligand discovery and peptide-based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38575678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.